this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
240 points (99.6% liked)

Europe

5119 readers
1546 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.ph/ktDRE

U.S. officials have told European allies they want them to keep buying American-made arms, amid recent moves by the European Union to limit U.S. manufacturers' participation in weapons tenders, five sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

What till Americans figure out where high quality small arms come from. Glock anyone? Beretta, Heckler & Koch, Benelli, Browning Arms Company (yes, Browning), SIG Sauer, Springfield Armory, Taurus (some), Chiappa, and more. And don't forget our Filipino friends at Rock Island Armory!

Sadly, this part of the tariff shitshow may actually work since we already have plenty of quality domestic producers. But fuck me, the SIG Sauer is the standard US military sidearm and Glock is standard everywhere else. Have fun cop budgets!

[–] federalreverse@feddit.org 1 points 22 hours ago

I ... can't imagine the US government cares about that (excuse the pun) caliber of gun too much. Police guns will largely be paid for from municipal and state budgets rather than the federal budget, and there's something larger at stake:

  • Large US producers want to make profits, and I can't imagine that small, extremely commoditized weapons are the best option for that.
  • The US government would probably like gain more control over the EU. If the US were to attack Greenland, they'd probably be happier if EU nations were immobilized because [shenanigans].

I may be wrong.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago

Well ... We want you to put the orange turd in jail and quit being dicks to everybody. You can't always get what you want, can you?

[–] PixelTron@lemm.ee 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have they thanked us for buying their weapons yet…

[–] phneutral@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago

And I don’t think they were wearing the right suits …

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

This sounds like it came from the same guy who wanted to sue companies for not advertising on twitter

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 93 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As I always said, the US never cared about the defense expenditure of European countries except as a way to bolster US exports.

It was always about extortion and never about defense.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 56 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yep, they were fine with 'footing the bill for European defense' as long as enough members bought F35s and whatever other pointless toys the US produced. Only France basically stuck with producing everything domestically.

Trump never really understood what that unspoken part of the bargain really was about. If Europe is going to actually spend 2% of GDP, they're going to keep that money domestically as much as possible instead of sending all that spending overseas in dollars.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Trump never really understood that most US "aid" is literally the US gov recycling old ordinance and equipment to continue siphoning tax dollars into the military industrial complex and it's oligarchs β€” expenses DOGE have not touched and do not consider "waste"... for some, certainly not fascist imperialism, reason...

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Trump never really understood

You could have stopped there.

[–] baggins@beehaw.org 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You'd think a businessman as bigly smart (people tell him all the time, many people) as he is would understand this.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 13 points 1 day ago

I still don't know if he's just stupid or if he's just doing what Putin wants by undermining NATO. I guess both could be true at the same time.

[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's a dealer, not a businessman. Deal β‰  business economics β‰  national economics β‰  global economics.

If you apply the "art of the deal" to the global economy, you'll wreck it. Well, if you apply his "art of the deal", you'll wreck basically anything except you're own wallet.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 12 hours ago

A del would imply he’s good at negotiation. He isn’t. He’s good at leveraging people, but mostly that’s been illegal. If he was good at deals, he wouldn’t have messed up international relations, which is deal making, but more complex. He’s a rich kid that fell upwards and inspired a cult following through sheer luck.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

MAGA: AMERICA FIRST!

Rest of world: OK, I guess we need to put ourselves first, too.

MAGA: NOT LIKE THAT!

[–] yopyop@feddit.nl 36 points 1 day ago

According to two of the sources, Rubio said any exclusion of U.S. companies from European tenders would be seen negatively by Washington,

Ah ah ah ! "Would be seen negatively"... Ah ah ah !

[–] axh@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

We want Greenland. We think you are all worthless freeloaders. We wish to kill your businesses with tariffs because you dared to sell us things (and we don't care how bad that will be for our people. My voters are too stupid and brainwashed to care and the opposition doesn't matter)... Also buy our weapons!

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 74 points 1 day ago

"Here's a tariff! Fuck you!"

We don't trust you anymore. We won't buy from you

"Noooo, but you must!"

Fuck 'em.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"No, we don't like that. We insist that you do not."

"Art of ze deal, non?"

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago

There is nobody more entitled on this planet than the Orange man and his followers.

[–] PixellatedDave@feddit.uk 13 points 1 day ago

EU not purchasing weapons from America; that's shocking! Anyway.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago

Let’s ditch the American weapons.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 day ago

I dunno I heard some American with a spray tan say that they didn't need Europe or Canada...

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

They say this after taunting Germany last month on a visit in Munich where they basically said youβ€˜d have to have military power to be sovereign.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

Maybe they should object to the reasons that made us buying European in the first place.

[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

Yea, we know that american interests wants that. European (allies?) are, understandably, not comfortable with that though.

Sounds like the Defense Industry doesn't want anybody upsetting the apple cart.

I wonder if these powerful businesses could come up with a solution? πŸ€”

Plsplspls buy from mee. Give that sweet sweet money. I neeed it soooo bad ~USA

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

I'm shocked.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder if he understands the conflict between "open market" and "tariffs," or if this is just a case of him not understanding that other countries get to make their own policy, or what.

I don't want the patient of the US to be operating under Maxim 13.

[–] Melchior@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is not about tariffs. If you buy US weapons, the US has some control over their use. You generally need ammunition, spare parts, service the weapons and for some more modern ones access to US servers. The contracts also usually include clauses of needing US permission to resell those weapons.

There were some rumors that the US forbid US made weapons to be given to Ukraine for some time. The EU does not want something similar to happen, if Russia attacks them.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago

This may not be only about tariffs, but they play into it, if only by making other countries unhappy with us.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like the US is looking for reason to either sell their weapons ..... or use them

Any way you slice it ..... war means profit

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

I hope USA doesn't sell to Russia...

[–] LarryLurkman@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago
[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 5 points 1 day ago

Lol, but this is a manufactured problem. Eat shit military industrial complex, you evil warmongers