Bad name for an act considering he didn't do it
this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
89 points (97.8% liked)
United States | News & Politics
2709 readers
1385 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It’d be awesome if California actually passes this and other states follow suit
I think that until we get healthcare reform, we should just let Luigi out after 2 or 3 months, and give him a new target. We've got a reality TV star for a president, so that's a hell of a lot more likely than it should be.
so much for the presumption of innocence.
not that I would return a guilty verdict for whoever did it, mind you.
I think people going in to comment before April 25th should recommend that they not name it after him. Removing his name from the bill would make it such a great amendment without the trouble that his name would make in getting it passed. This bill has the potential to really make a difference and save a lot of lives, while providing compensation in triplicate it said.
Make the Democrat party put their money where their mouth is and actually pass it. I'm sure he'd be happy just to see it happen.
shit. we need this in illinois.