this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1214 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

74961 readers
2590 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] liquidthex@reddthat.com 3 points 5 months ago

It's so wild how laws just have no idea what to do with you if you just add one layer of proxy. "Nooo I'm not stealing and plagerizing, it's the AI doing it!"

[–] RatherBeMTB@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Over in the US, that's giving China the advantage in AI development. Won't happen.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 2 points 5 months ago

It's it's like USA adopting China's IP laws.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Ip should solely be with the creator and not the corporation that owns that creator. A lot of problems in stems is IP held hostage by the corporations and by publishing companies of research papers

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 months ago

Arr, matey.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Please, let it be over. Idiotic "ai"....

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

He's afraid of losing his little empire.

OpenAI also had no clue on recreation the happy little accident that gave them chatGPT3. That's mostly because their whole thing was using a simple model and brute forcing it with more data, more power, more nodes and then even more data and power until it produced results.

As expected, this isn't sustainable. It's beyond the point of decreasing returns. But Sam here has no idea on how to fix that with much better models so goes back to the one thing he knows: more data needed, just one more terabyte bro, ignore the copyright!

And now he's blaming the Chinese into forcing him to use even more data.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Do you promise?!?!

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think the answer is there just do what deepseek did.

[–] Tungsten5@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

I dont wanna be mean but I always thought this guy had a weird face

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps this is just a problem with the way the model works. Always requiring new data and unable to use current data, to ponder and expand upon while making new connections about ideas that influenced the author… LLM’s are a smoke and mirrors show, not a real intelligence.

[–] Emmie@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

They do seem fundamentally limited somehow. With all the bazillion watts they are cheap imitation at best compared to mere 20 Watts of human brain

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 2 points 5 months ago

Apparantly their trying to get Deepseek banned again, really doesn't like competition this guy.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›