this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
385 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

64937 readers
3950 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago

Thanks for the reminder that I own DVDs

I forgot all about them in storage

[–] caboose2006@lemm.ee 52 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

For those saying "just pirate it" some people like the option of physical media and have moral qualms about piracy. This is actually a good thing WB is doing. Just let people have their DVDs

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If you own the physical DVD, fair use allows you to own a backup copy, so torrenting it in that case would not be unethical nor illegal.

[–] Krompus@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

You’re allowed to make your own backup, but I’m pretty sure downloading somebody else’s backup is still illegal? First time I’ve seen someone suggest otherwise, would love more details about the actual laws.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not a law talking guy, but from my understanding of it, downloading isn't illegal. But if you're torrenting it, you're uploading bits of it to others while you're downloading. That would be distributing it to others, so that's copyright infringement.

So if you could find a way to download something without uploading anything, you'd be fine. Kinda like if someone uploads copyright infringing material to youtube. You're not going to get into hot water for watching that video, but the person who uploaded is.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 1 points 13 hours ago

Apparently, Facebook managed to do it because they downloaded the whole pirated library without seeding it.

[–] Zanz@lemmy.ml 2 points 12 hours ago

Downloading a copy would not be illegal in the US. Uploading a copy to someone would likely be illegal.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean maybe technically (I'm sure it varies depending on country). But I'm not aware of any cases where they've ever pursued anyone for that.

It's definitely a grey area in the US, I believe (again, no precedent set), and someone with a good lawyer could actually get a good ruling here, which would set the precedent. Which is probably why they never pursue it. I think that happened with VHS when people were taping shows in the 80s/90s (could be misremembering that).

The concept of "fair use" in general (not referring to specific interpretations of the term) definitely allows you to do this. At least how I interpret it. I am not a lawyer.

So if it were me, I'd only be concerned with the ethics, and I see nothing ethically wrong with it whatsoever. But that's just me.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago

I don't know about the US specifically, but oftentimes, and definitely where I'm from, laws can have a small amount of "common sense" leeway and judges can find justifications for rulings if they want to rule a particular way. e.g. I have pirated games that I legally bought because there's literally no functioning "official" download link anymore, if anyone were to ever prosecute me for that, even if it were illegal technically a judge could find a way to rule it lawful out of sympathy or whatever other reason, if they wanted to. A lot of the time it's "the government can't have possibly intended this law to be enforced this way, therefore I rule XYZ".

In any case, as you said, I've never heard of anyone being pursued for that. And if it's not enforced, it's not a law.

[–] pogmommy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 12 hours ago

I totally understand the desire to own physical media and agree that WB is doing the right thing here, but optical media is terrible means of preserving media. If your discs are suffering from disc rot, you really shouldn't lose sleep over making or "sourcing" your own local digital copies.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 2 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, that is a very valid option! I don't like it when people not into collecting do it, though. Because it makes zero logical sense for a digital copy to be tied to a physical thing, unless you like the sentimental value of said physical thing as well.

[–] VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

be ye shill or bootlicker, may thou be cast at great speed into our Goddess and saviour Sol

[–] caboose2006@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

I'm all for piracy. I just recognise different people want different things.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago

I must remind you where your Bluray Remux release is sourced from.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck off, these people already own it at this point, so there is no such moral qualms. They paid for it. As for physical media, do you think only these companies can burn ISOs to DVD????

[–] caboose2006@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

Yes they already own them and WB is replacing them, they're not buying them again. Man, so hostile. And for some there are those moral qualms. I know some of them. I'm not one of them. Calm down

[–] RxBrad@infosec.pub 8 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I knew WB's HD-DVDs (remember those?) were a timebomb. I didn't realize regular DVDs were, too.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 5 points 11 hours ago

All optical media is.

[–] Lootboblin@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

I just checked one of my dvd shelf and two WB movies that should be in excellent condition were little bit sticky from both sides. This feels like a flashback to when Arturia’s hardware keys and knobs started to ”melt” after few years. Companies use cheapest plastics possible.

[–] JoeDyrt@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It doesn’t matter. If the CD/DVD works, copy it immediately. If not, so sorry.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

or just pirate it whenever.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Yeah seriously; never understood why a certain sector of people obsess over backing up their personal media, when you can literally download a perfect copy straight from the internet with no effort on your part. Especially when it comes to widely-available media like popular Hollywood films or video games that sold well. Just grab a torrent and toss the disc.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Pirated copies rarely contain any of the extras. Some people actually do watch those.

[–] riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 18 hours ago

Extras are something I miss from modern movie distribution.

After finishing a movie you could watch the deleted scenes and behind the scenes and such. I rarely did the commentary watch of the movie but it was cool that it was there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago

If you only need popular shows in english sure.

Plenty of older things which where made for localized television cannot be found online but can be found in public libraries.

[–] desperado@feddit.nl 1 points 17 hours ago

Some prefer different languages or options. For many animations like Disney and DreamWorks children like to watch in native language, while adults like to occasionally watch in original language. Native language as pirated version are hard to come by these days.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, those online copy's either originate from someone sharing their backed up collection or a camera pointed at the TV.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago

Most of what I download are webrips, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 5 points 1 day ago

And some hard to find movies can be lost forever because nobody have them anymore

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m digitizing my SO’s cd collection now. Half are normal cds. 1/4 are promo or weird stuff from bands that barely existed. The rest are mix tapes or unreleased things from when they worked as a music journalist in college.

[–] pirat@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Sounds like a pretty interesting collection to me!

[–] musubibreakfast@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Because these people often don't want to pirate. In Germany the government now fines you for piracy, using a common VPN isn't enough anymore. Then there are other factors such as remasters and changes.

Fight Club, The Matrix, The Terminator and Star Wars are all popular films but there are several versions out there with different color grades and special effects. So I completely understand why this subset of people would want to keep their version of the movie.

[–] pirat@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

In Germany the government now fines you for piracy, using a common VPN isn't enough anymore.

Why isn't a common zero-logs VPN enough? How would the government know? Encrypted VPN traffic can't be decrypted, at least until we have quantum computers, right?

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

or even a seedbox in another country.

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 2 points 20 hours ago

Are they cracking down on I2P?

[–] CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You also have to deal with whatever settings the uploader decided to use when they transcoded the original rip. Which can mess with the color grade and contrast ratio, the hdr grading, introduce noise, and otherwise fuck with the video quality and audio quality.

Most people won't care, but to some it matters.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

remuxes are not hard to find.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Buying music CD and either ripping to flac or pirating flac after it (physically) arrived to keep it sealed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 91 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shockingly good news from a media corp. Paramount would just steal your discs and tell you to pound sand

[–] CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As would Sony and Disney. It is surprising that WB is doing this.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

I think this is because WB used cheaper manufacturing and now they're failing way before they should.

[–] Tillman@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Over the Top (dvd in photo) is an excellent movie.

[–] exu@feditown.com 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I didn't know DVDs are supposed to last 100 years. That's definitely not the case with newer storage media, be it BluRay, hard disks or even worse SSDs.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Modern Blurays should actually last longer than DVDs. Bluray M-Discs supposedly even last 1000 years. 100 years for DVDs is pretty optimistic. 20-50 years is more realistic.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Apparently there's some huge drama in data hoarding communities about manufacturers switching between different recording technologies, and how everybody is worried that they aren't going to last for 5-10-100-1000 years.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Welp, guess I'm digging out my complete SG1 collection tonight.

I have to watch them all, you say? No, honey, this is important work I'm doing here. 😎

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›