Not The Onion

14070 readers

2213 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

158

Trump's AG Claims She Will Release More Epstein Docs, but They May Be Redacted for National Security (gizmodo.com)

submitted 4 days ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 58 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They may be redacted as to not implicate the president?

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 23 points 4 days ago

Haven't we already confirmed Trump's in the flight logs with his daughter?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago

████████████ Bill and Crooked Hillary Clinton █████████████████████████████████████. ███████████████████████████████████.

██████████████████████████████████████████████ buttery males, ████████████████████████ at which point Jeffrey Epstein then committed suicide, just trust me bro.

A convincing facsimile of the documents to be released

[–] Tramort@programming.dev 48 points 4 days ago

What information could possibly be relevant to national security?

It's just names.

Any reaction means it's a member of the administration, because they aren't going to protect anyone else.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Is it too much to hope that they fuck up, redacting the names by drawing a box over text in a PDF?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

They dont make that mistake on account of the software they use literally not allowing that.

[–] A_norny_mousse@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

Sounds perfectly realistic to me!

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago

Trump raped underage girls.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Anywhere you see a black bar, especially when it's coupled with a underaged girl, it's safe to assume and put Trump's name in place of it and reposting it back on Facebook and X.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They really thought Trump would ever do this? He's the most likely person to burn them.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 3 days ago

I love the unedited fox news interview

Would you release the Epstein files?

Uh... Well... Uh... Maybe? Yeah, I think I would, but I'd have to take a closer look, it could cause problems for people. But yeah...I think I would. Yeah.

After rapid fire "yes" to every other document they asked about, it really stands out

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

Is there any need though? All the people they care about probably have full immunity from anything.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

everyone knows donald was a frequent flier there.