Okay. I guess I just don't see a political group getting more donations than their opposition as all that nefarious. If you have organised lobbying at all, this has got to be the most defensible kind. I guess I'd support a cap on the amount that can be donated to such a group by any one person.
A lot of this article just rehashes the old anti-MAID arguments, which I suspect is the real motive behind it, and I'll rehash my response: If you don't want people to prefer death to the way they're treated, what exactly is your plan to treat them better? Doing anything else, including limiting their ability to make decisions you're uncomfortable with, is just an added cruelty on top.