this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
145 points (94.5% liked)

Asklemmy

45464 readers
702 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just wanted to prove that political diversity ain't dead. Remember, don't downvote for disagreements.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 35 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Y'all don't need to keep adding things to lgbtq or lgbt+. The q or + takes care of everything

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 days ago

I think this is a better argument that "queer" is the best catch-all phrase. Honestly, come to think of it, if we can phase out LGBT in favour of "queer" entirely, then that gives republicans a harder time to separate the T.

[–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I'm working on transitioning to using They/Them pronouns for everyone since they're completely neutral and fit every context. If your preference is Xe/Xem, I respect that—but unfortunately, my brain just doesn't have the bandwidth to keep track of multiple pronouns consistently. You get They/Them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (18 children)

I'm mostly an anarchist. But.

I think that there needs to be some degree of authoritarian, arbitrary power. Mostly because I've been in anarchist groups in the past, and when everyone has input into a decision, shit gets bogged down really fast. Not everyone understands a given issue and will be able to make an informed choice, and letting opinionated-and-ignorant people make choices that affect the whole group is... Not good.

The problem is, I don't know how to balance these competing interests, or exactly where authoritarian power should stop. It's easy to say, well, I should get to make choices about myself, but what about when those individual choices end up impacting other people? For instance, I eat meat, and yet I'm also aware that the cattle industry is a significant source of CO2; my choice, in that case, contributes to climate change, which affects everyone. ...And once you start going down that path, it's really easy to arrive at totalitarianism as the solution.

I also don't know how to handle the issue of trade and commerce, and at what point it crosses the line into capitalism.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You might be interested in the essay The Tyranny of Structurelessness, which goes over the same concept you speak of with requiring some degree of formalization of structure in order to prevent unaccountable structure from forming. I'm not an Anarchist, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] ziproot@lemmy.ml 28 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I believe that the stance against nuclear power (specifically, nuclear fission, as opposed to radioisotope power used by spacecraft) by greens undermines the fight to stop global warming, and that many of the purported issues with nuclear power have been solved or were never really issues in the first place.

For instance: the nuclear waste produced by old-gen reactors can be used by newer generations.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pet1t@lemm.ee 32 points 6 days ago (14 children)

I am very very very left wing, BUT I can get really annoyed with a lot of those "on my side" advocating for the most idealist of all idealism, as if it's a contest. Feels like a competition of "who's the bestest and mostest leftist of all". You scare people away and - not justifying it - but I get why some people get upset with "the left" because of this...

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 19 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I believe that the vast majority of people are inherently good, and that tribalism and political divisiveness are some of the biggest issues we have to face.

Political differences arise mostly from different values, fears, education (or lack thereof), etc, but most people if you get to know them believe what they do because they believe it is genuinely good. But increasingly politics is focused on vilifying others, instead of trying to understand each other.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

How do we tackle those problems you mentioned?

The reason I ask is I support your view here, but recently I’ve been downvoted a lot for having the opinion that I don’t blame people still using Twitter as I believe, like you, that most people are good people and can be reasoned out of what we believe are the wrong beliefs and that staying in those places to converse with them is better than Twitter becoming a right wing place and us chilling here in left wing ideology but at the end of that nobody learns anything they didn’t already know.

The hardest challenge in changing someone’s beliefs is that people don’t want to admit they were wrong or lied to or used or whatever and this makes it challenging if we can’t take our ego out of the equation.

Anecdotal proof that people can change is a YouTuber called JimmyTheGiant and he has mentioned several times how he went down the alt right pipeline but started to question things and now makes left leaning content.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EsmereldaFritzmonster@lemmings.world 23 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Stop out-woking one another, it's okay to be right silently in order to bring in fence sitters.

If someone says, "my spirit animal told me late-stage capitalism is evil" welcome them to the club with open arms, focus on how you're alike and trust them to work out their faux pas over time spent among like-minded peers.

Also cultural appropriation ≠ exploitation, we can stop clutching our collective pearls over these faux pas.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 24 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I'm far left, but I believe that any citizen should be allowed to own any gun.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

For what it's worth, the far left (internationally) is traditionally pro-gun. I wouldn't know what positions are about any citizen and any gun, but I wouldn't be surprised either to hear a socialist advocate for it.

Obligatory:

[...] The whole proletariat [i.e. worker class] must be armed at once with muskets, rifles, cannon and ammunition, and the revival of the old-style citizens’ militia, directed against the workers, must be opposed. Where the formation of this militia cannot be prevented, the workers must try to organize themselves independently as a proletarian guard, with elected leaders and with their own elected general staff; they must try to place themselves not under the orders of the state authority but of the revolutionary local councils set up by the workers. Where the workers are employed by the state, they must arm and organize themselves into special corps with elected leaders, or as a part of the proletarian guard. Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary. The destruction of the bourgeois [i.e. owner class] democrats’ influence over the workers, and the enforcement of conditions which will compromise the rule of bourgeois democracy, which is for the moment inevitable, and make it as difficult as possible – these are the main points which the proletariat and therefore the League must keep in mind during and after the approaching uprising.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago

That's the far-left stance, generally.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I dont know who told you leftists don't like guns, we like guns plenty. It's liberals who don't like guns. Us leftists know sometimes you got to throw a bomb into the carriage of a tzar. We leftists knowwhen you go on strike you should bring a gun with you, cuz the Liberals going to try to use the National Guard to murder you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SlothMama@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (10 children)

Freedom of speech for absolutely everyone, especially people I disagree with and that disagree with me

[–] UniversalMonk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago

Yep. Lemme isn't really a fan if free speech and they usually say it leads to nazi things. But I'm all for free speech even if bad guys use it too.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

I don't like racism against white people or sexism against men. Do I think they're less urgent or worrying than bigotry directed at other groups? Sure. There's less hate against men and whites compared to other groups, and bigotry against them doesn't have the same social or political impact due to current systemic racism and sexism being directed at others. But bigotry is still bigotry, and I don't like bigotry against anyone.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

You can be Jewish and even support the idea of a Jewish homeland while also being fervently appalled by the actions of the state of Israel (Netanyahu, West Bank settlements, unarmed Palestinians shot/killed, houses being bulldozed, mass displacements).

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 days ago

Liberal zionists are still zionists

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 23 points 6 days ago (9 children)

Immigration is universally a roaring net positive in all of history ; economically, socially, everything. It's more than disinformation when they spew talking points. It's hate. And most people complicit are just fully ignorant. USA lost their empire due to lack of education. Every other first world nations have their success in lockstep with the level of education they give their kids. A heist of all wealth has been conducted and you are viewing the aftermath. Elon will find your coffers empty. The real treasure, turns out, was the people.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Mental health focused communities exascerbate their members' issues

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I don't like extreme leftists (they live in a bubble) but they've been right about everything and they are our best chance at resolving economic disparity

[–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm curious how you square "they live in a bubble" with them being right?

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I live in denial that Capitalism is a broken system but that visage is cracking like an egg in egg_irl every minute that passes.

If I actually had that level of fuck you money i'd give it to them, just for the purpose of burning everything to the ground, and starting anew.

[–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 6 days ago

Doesn't sound like they live in a bubble, then.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago

I appreciate the recognition, but I think being right implies a lack of living in a bubble, right? Like, we might be annoying, but certainly not detached.

[–] random@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I'm anarchist left, but I do think every human should have the right to defend themself and thereforce should be able to bear arms

I'm not american if anyone's gonna ask

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Im left leaning on many social issues but pronouns was never a necessary social construct hill we needed to die on.

I think that useless fight got us the full hard swing to the right.

Especially because you shouldn't give a fuck about how people perceive you. You should be whoever you are and not care about labels.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We should try harder to keep weapons out of the hands of criminals, sometimes taxation is necessary and sometimes it's beneficial even if we don't factor in revenue, people will sometimes make decisions that are so bad that we have a moral obligation to intervene in order to protect them from the most disastrous outcomes

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›