this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
1343 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

63186 readers
5006 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] smeg@infosec.pub 40 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

How many times can people keep making the same mistake without us concluding they're stupid? Closed corporate social networks ALWAYS go to shit. Enshitification is inevitable. And you'll have the sunk cost fallacy stopping them from leaving, until they all finally get fed up and switch again. Own your network - stop swapping.

[–] sm1dger@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

But we did leave and if (or when) it becomes enshitified, we will move again. We don't need an idealised platform, we just want something easy to use which doesn't (yet) have the baggage and culture of twiXer

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 11 hours ago

But we did leave...

...about a decade too late.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago

They gotta get their news out to the masses, at least they choose something besides twitter.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Scientists should consult tech people about stuff like this just like we should consult scientists for science stuff. Unfortunately a lot of tech people also aren't conscious of this stuff either.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 122 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Good. Sucks that it took open fascism to get that to happen, but at least it happened.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hulfpa@lemmy.ml 86 points 19 hours ago (24 children)

Why are they selecting BlueSky over the Fediverse?

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 60 points 19 hours ago (22 children)

The Fediverse experience starts with an unanswerable question: what server do you want to be on?

Most people will not have any way to answer that without knowing what the downstream impact will be. Mastodon people are working on smoothing that down, but it's still a pretty fraught question. And if half a given community ends up on one server and half on another, they get fragmented and conversations and followers fizzle out.

Bluesky wants to tell people they're not a single-node lock-in to avoid the Twitter effect, but it turns out that's their key advantage.

The only thing that will guarantee they don't end up like Twitter is if they revamp their corporate governance mechanisms, but they had to take VC money and haven't come up with a long-term revenue model, so it's not clear how they can avoid it.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 28 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I don't understand why people ask this. Most people you talk to on Lemmy will say they don't want the userbase to grow much more than it has because with that growth comes the other problems that larger platforms like shitter and reddit have.

That's true by and large and we also don't have enough moderators here as is.

And for reasons I don't understand, people keep asking why mainstream media outlets, influencers, and other trusted accounts don't transition to the fediverse, as if they won't bring with them an influx of users (at least a fraction of which would be considered undesirable).

Why do you want them to come here? (As someone who would like to see Lemmy grow, I'm curious about how you think this will rollout and what the consequences will be). I would like to see Lemmy grow but I'm not sure all of that growth will have solely good follow-on effects.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago

Presumably either because they've not heard of the Fediverse, because almost nobody has, and/or because they want people to actually see what they post.

[–] whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world 34 points 19 hours ago

The fediverse just doesn’t have the audience nor ease of use to be the smart investment for most people, at least in the short term.

In the long term, I believe the fediverse would be the right move. However most people struggle to think long-term outside of their own fields, and scientists are not immune to this phenomenon.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 24 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

nothing makes me more skeptical than seeing the word "scientists" in a headline.

[–] TheEschatonSucks@sh.itjust.works 45 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

At least they weren’t baffled

[–] qisope@lemmy.world 19 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Surely there was at least some kind of breakthrough

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 13 points 16 hours ago

perhaps a bafflethrough

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›