this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
1062 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

63186 readers
3452 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago* (last edited 4 minutes ago)

Would be better if it was Mastodon, but I suppose I shouldn't let perfect be the enemy of good, and good riddance to Twitter, indeed.

[–] DSTGU@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

First time seeing HTTP code 451

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago

https://http.cat/status/451

because I needed an explanation of what that means, and I wanted it to be cute and funny.

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 56 points 4 hours ago (9 children)

I feel like scientists should move towards open source solutions ... I feel like most scientists are smart enough to launch a mastodon server, but well.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 4 points 40 minutes ago

Bluesky is open source though

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 minutes ago

Being a scientist doesn't mean you have the technical knowledge to run a public facing server.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

Most people who work as "scientists" aren't actually scientists.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 minutes ago

Define "Scientist".

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

while I agree, the reality of the situation is that when you get down to comparing feature to feature, open source solutions tend to be technically inferior to proprietary ones.

I use linux because I hate microsoft, not because it's more feature complete than windows (it isn't).

I use lemmy because I hate u/spez, not because it's more feature complete than reddit (it isn't).

I use blender because it's free and it's actually kinda great, if all free and open source software was like blender, then it would be a no-brainer to use FOSS all of the time, and it would be easy to convince the normies to do the same.


also also

I'm using linux mint, i have minor complaints about it, but nothing worse than what microsoft is currently doing with windows. It's just different, and that bothers me. middle click paste is the bane of my existence, but other people swear by it. Just before I switched over, I learned about windows 10's built in emoji keyboard, and I really liked that. A year later (literally last week) I discovered a program that does most of what the windows emoji thingy did, and I can manually edit a keybind for the function to accomplish amost the same thing. FOSS, yay, it's free if you don't value your time in currency amounts. FOSS could be so good if only it were good.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 29 minutes ago

I use linux because I hate microsoft, not because it’s more feature complete than windows (it isn’t).

lol... "Feature complete" if you want terrible features.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 18 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

Most scientists aren't allowed to do stuff like that, or purely just don't have the time.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Or know how. Just because they are scientists doesn't mean that they are necessarily particularly computer literate. I once had to explain to a university professor that wireless electricity doesn't exist, and the Wi-Fi is only for internet. So yeah.

[–] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 42 minutes ago

I mean, wireless electricity tech does exist, it just sucks and is horribly inefficient at any reasonable distance.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Some of us have. There are a few science focused servers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

Now all governments around the globe and other public services and we.are getting somewhere.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 19 points 4 hours ago

There's no excuse for using Xittter in 2025.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago

See you can be a really good scientist and not smart at the same time. Move to mastodon.

load more comments
view more: next ›