this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
28 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

8004 readers
803 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As a microbrew fan, I wouldn't mind seeing beers from other provinces being made available.

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Whiskys and gins too please!

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

LCBO's Ontario protectionism has been a PITA. We used to at least be able to pick up some Quebec beers like Maudite and Fin du Monde, if not some of the smaller breweries. Would be nice to see a reversal of that.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is great news. I hope the feds don’t screw this up for us.

Crazy that it takes a Nazi dictator threatening annexation for our government to come together and do something. It’s about time.

[–] whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 20 hours ago

Nothing unites quite like a common threat

[–] novacomets@lemmy.myserv.one -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you always take people's words literal, at face value?

[–] hoserhobbes@lemmy.ca 5 points 17 hours ago

Are you always surprised when people do something after saying they would do that thing multiple times?

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I gather that these kinds of barriers have likely been up for a very long time, long before I was old enough to really understand them.

So here I am at 48 years old trying to wrap my brain around why there were internal trade barriers in the first place. What reasons were given when they were first put up?

Please explain it as you would a child...

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This was a decent explainer. In a nutshell...

  • There are four categories of trade barriers in Canada: natural barriers such as geography, prohibitive barriers such as restrictions on the sale of alcohol, technical barriers such as vehicle weight standards and regulatory barriers such as licensing and paperwork requirements.

  • The 2017 CFTA was intended to cut down on some of these barriers, but all provinces and territories negotiated exemptions for various reasons, ranging from different safety regulations across provinces, to different language requirements, to industry protectionism.

It's not clear right now which barriers the feds can unilaterally eliminate (and whether we agree with all of them), but I guess we'll find out within the next week or so.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks!

So basically a question of natural barriers and I guess you could call it "standardization"; different provinces having different rules.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pretty much. There's a strong argument that "eliminating barriers" may be synonymous with "deregulation," which...could go badly.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yup. An example would be tractor trailer loads, ie: in Saskatchewan a tractor can legally pull 3 trailers ... in BC that's impossible because of the Rockies. There's also the issue of tire chains: in BC it's manditory for some highways (incl tractors) and on others it's not. Chains in the prairies just don't make sense, and they chew up the asphalt something fierce.

It'll take a while to sort out what's OK and what's not.

[–] Dearche@lemmy.ca 2 points 15 hours ago

Even for that example, there's the issue of maximum height as well. Different provinces have different standards for clearance, which is why every once in a while you hear about a truck that strikes a bridge or other underpass.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago

here's one (biased) take https://breachmedia.ca/freakout-about-canadas-internal-trade-barriers-a-corporate-scam/

makes some good points about how some barriers prevent a race to the bottom and allow provinces to take actions protecting their workers and industry

Abolish all domestic barriers.