this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
101 points (99.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5282 readers
520 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Especially_the_lies@startrek.website 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Imagine spending 40 years telling the world what is going to happen if people don't do something drastic, only to be mocked, paid lip service, and completely ignored. That pretty much says it all.

[–] LongbottomLeaf@lemmy.nz 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cassandra and 12 Monkeys spring to mind.

I want to know how climatologists recommend dealing with depression. I feel like they might have some tips for me.

[–] sinkingship@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I want to know how climatologists recommend dealing with depression.

Since I read this more often recently: I don't think the scientists are the right address for that. Scientists expertise is mostly factual, emotionless calculus and number evaluation. Some might deal with the same fears, just hiding them from the public.

Probably a scientist who has also expertise in psychology would do, though.

But ultimately, I think, the fear's and depression's origin comes from the knowledge that the way we live makes the situation only worse. So the only way to get rid of that conflict in the mind would be a meaningful change in the way we live. As that doesn't seem happen, we can only work to deal with the situation.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

How can you trust all those scientists? Everyone knows people go into science only for the fame, money and power. We should trust these politicians instead saying everything is actually fine as long as we vote for them!

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 23 points 1 year ago

Soon it will be considered rude to bring up people's climate change denials. They will say its very unfair of you to bring that up.

That's what gets me.

[–] Changetheview@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

“Climate activism should not be considered an altruistic endeavor. Instead, climate action should be viewed as an act of survival, a necessity.”

This right here. We criminalize and punish people for harming others and even property. It’s time to use this view against climate change by updating and enforcing criminal liability against major actors.

The actions harm other people and the actors do not care because the damage is mostly external. This is exactly what criminal justice systems are there to fix.

[–] Treevan@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://aussie.zone/post/1152294

Group therapy helps scientists cope with challenging 'climate emotions'

We know collective and individual climate action can alleviate negative climate emotions.

It’s very easy to fall into this vortex, right? Of thinking about climate change as a problem and not just climate change, but global environmental change, ecological loss.

The nature of academia means climate emotions overlap with “Intersectionality” to worsen their experience.

Our findings support the value of group therapy as a cathartic outlet for climate emotions among environmental scientists.

As a result, climate anxiety is likely to become more prolific, perhaps most so in climate scientists.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

they feel hot