this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
433 points (99.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

20188 readers
1224 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] superkret@feddit.org 31 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

BUT WHY IS THE RAM GONE?!?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 8 points 4 hours ago

RAM is temporary, meeting the minimum viable product standard is forever

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

COBOL has entered the chat: If it ain't broke don't fix it.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Given the engineer's amendment to "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." is usually "If it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet.", I can only surmise that COBOL must be one of those languages that are so terrible that they deter their programmers from wanting to do that.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

I once had to modify some COBOL code. It's a highly organized language, not terrible. But because it's old there's a shortage of people now who are good at it or want to learn it. You pretty much have to decide your career is going to be working on old code.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

If it ain't broke don't fix it.

I loathe that line

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

If it ain’t broke… maintain it.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

+1 - the word "loathe" doesn't get used often enough. The only time I remember hearing it in a movie was in Sixteen Candles.

[–] Cano@lemm.ee 43 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

All fun and games till the PO requests some new feature or change and some poor soul has to add that into your code trying not to break it

Bonus points if the poor soul is you

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 8 points 7 hours ago

Faster to rewrite the whole thing

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 17 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The Pirate's Code Style and Documentation Standard....be more like guidelines.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 19 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

My boss once asked me whether their entrance test was too hard after several candidates sent him something that wouldn't even run.

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 2 points 2 hours ago

Classic write-up!

Although, now that I'm an interviewer, I kind of despise FizzBuzz, because nobody thinks clearly during a high pressure interview.

Whenever possible, I love to talk with a candidate about some concrete past source code they claim to have written. I've better luck putting the candidate at ease and then talking through their contributions to the code.

Of course, when I get enough candidates who shared source code, I don't even invite the ones who didn't share source code for an interview.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 4 points 6 hours ago

I thought my entrance test was far too easy, I only had to create a blog in my web framework and show doing the basics like validations, secure parameters, etc.

I learned later on that most couldn’t pass because they came from other languages and thought they could get by without knowing anything.

[–] Cano@lemm.ee 14 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That's an instant ego boost

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 16 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Should working code even be part of an interview? Seems like a situation rife with abuse.

Need free contractors? Just put your code issues up as a 4hr take home interview test.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 hours ago

how the applicant thinks breaks down problems and handles how to answer them matters more than if the code is actually functional on the spot

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 8 hours ago

Pseudocode/general thought process walkthrough should be the only thing imo. Oh no, the interviewee forgot a semicolon, so he is trash at coding and is a no-fit is complete bullshit.

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 2 points 9 hours ago

One guy completed it, so it was just perfect

[–] fxomt@lemm.ee 16 points 9 hours ago

It worksish, but look at it the wrong way and it'll collapse entirely.

[–] NudeNewt@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago

I wrote "some code" back when I was a child, if you asked me to explain how it works all I could tell you is "through the power of santa's little helper".