this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
154 points (98.7% liked)

World News

40161 readers
3182 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Denmark will invest $2.05 billion to strengthen Arctic security amid Trump’s push for control over Greenland.

The strategic territory has gained importance due to melting ice, opening new shipping routes and exposing security vulnerabilities.

Denmark’s plan includes new ships, long-range drones, and satellite capacity to bolster its limited military presence.

Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen is meeting European leaders to reinforce unity.

The move follows Trump’s insistence that Greenland is vital to U.S. security, citing its key role in missile defense operations.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 6 days ago

From all the things I predicted 2025 to have in store for the EU, I didn't expect a war with the USA. What a shit timeline this is.

due to melting ice, opening new shipping routes

this is just sad

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

citing its key role in missile defense operations.

So then just ask nicely if you can build missile defenses in your ally's land?

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

That's what's so stupid. They already have bases there. Denmark would say yes for sure.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Money that's not being spent to arm Ukraine or prepare against potential Russian invasions of NATO countries. What a useful Ploy this has been. Got to hand it to Putin he knows how to use his tools, however decrepit they may be.

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Canada, that actually has land really close to Greenland: haha let's play a silly war of flags and alcohol over an island no one cares about, it'll be fun.

The US, that has absolutely nothing to do there: all your base are belong to us

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It's almost like Canada is civilized and generally not hostile towards neighboring countries.
It was kind of funny with that dispute, it's almost sad it got resolved.
Greetings from Denmark. 😀

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Nothing to do there implies there are no resources. Which is untrue, and the reason why the US wants it. "National security" just sounds better to a random dude.

[–] refreeze@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Canada technically shares a land border with Denmark: Hans Island

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Somebody set us up the Trump

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Omg I've had it wrong all these years

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

It's not just you, it's a very common mistake. Like "arrow to the knee" instead of "arrow in the knee."