this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
7 points (66.7% liked)

Technology

1709 readers
459 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The tech industry's reaction to AI model DeepSeek R1 has been wild. Pat Gelsinger, for instance, is elated and thinks it will make AI better for everyone.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lmao imagine working at a startup run by the guy who was driving when Intel drove off a cliff

[–] Cat@ponder.cat -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

What does this has to do with the article here?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because the CEO I’m talking about is Pat Gelsinger

[–] Cat@ponder.cat -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know, I mean what does this has to do with their use of AI.

Gelsinger is infamous in the industry due to his very recent and catastrophic bout of poor management of one of the pillars of American technology. I’m saying that, broadly, I find it comical that any competent engineer would consent to work for him, specifically due to his tenure at Intel. I’m saying I wouldn’t personally work for him or an organization that picked him for leadership, full stop, regardless of which LLM models or frameworks he elects his company to use, or any other technology for that matter.