this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
463 points (96.6% liked)

World News

40161 readers
2905 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

In a virtual speech at the World Economic Forum, Trump suggested Canada could become a U.S. state to avoid his proposed tariffs on imports.

The remark elicited gasps from the audience.

Trump claimed the U.S. does not need Canadian lumber, energy, or vehicles, vastly overstating the trade deficit between the two nations.

He reiterated his intention to impose tariffs, potentially as high as 25%, on imports from Canada and Mexico starting February 1.

Economists warn such tariffs would raise prices for U.S. consumers.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] studentofarkad@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Did someone brainwash this dude to annex other countries or something? Its like he wants to leave a legacy behind of being the first president in the modern age to expand America.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He’s an agent provocateur hired by the Russkis whether he knows it or not.

[–] Homescool@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The best puppet. Nobody takes a hand up the butt like me.

[–] wide_eyed_stupid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Well, his idol annexed and invaded other countries, so obviously he should too!

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Why isn't Canada summoning the US ambassador to demand official explanations?

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

They don't need explanation or translation for "he dumb and doesn't understand money outside of wanting more".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

Over my dead body, eh you hoser, tabarnak!

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

So a huge state with an overton window to the left of the US?

But why have only one state when we can have more!

Use gerrymandering tactics to pack all the conservatives in one state, then split the rest in a 60/40 ratio, and make them all winner take all.

magats will lose presidency and the senate forever

How do you like them apples?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

Don't even talk about the possibility. Don't even weigh it up. He needs to be told and shown very firmly that this will never happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

I bet he'll end up sprinkling in a handful of very specific exemptions. These are what we need to slap export taxes on. Doesn't need to be much, but match his 25%. At best it'll hammer them where they need it, at worst it'll keep things fair for all our exporters.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

We must strengthen NATO's defences against the aggressive USA and significantly improve border defences, lest they catch us with our pants down when the time comes.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Reminder that Tariffs dont work as a threat to other nations.

The selling price is the same for the seller, they already give the lowest price they can profit from because the modern era allows international distributors to find a demand anywhere, the buyers are the ones paying the import tax for the same goods.

If you were selling and then the buyer had a tariff you wouldn't just agree to take less money as a result.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›