this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
261 points (97.8% liked)

News

23980 readers
4193 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Oh... He's not even the real Dread Pirate Roberts!

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

I didn't even notice that this happened:

Today, President Biden granted Leonard Peltier executive clemency and commuted the remainder of his sentence.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It’s so easy to see who bough his bitcoin “scam” now, isn’t it?

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You think Ross did from prison?

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Of course they do. This is how they cope with anything Trump related. They come up with conspiracy theories.

[–] Spookyghost@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Kodak black paid 2mil for a pardon the first time. This is highly likely to be true, you are either uniformed, a bot, or in on the grift.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Ross was an idiot, that’s why he was caught. They seized all his remaining bitcoin, what hadn’t been stolen by hackers because, again, he was an idiot and the Silk Road was slapped together from code cobbled from other places. There’s no way the dude was smart enough to set some aside for bribes in case he got caught, because he was so sure he wouldn’t that he advertised the Silk Road using his personal email with his real name in forum posts.

While I don’t think he deserved life in prison, he sure as hell ended up there because of how ridiculously idiotic he was. The dude isn’t smart enough to be a manager at Arby’s, let alone run a criminal enterprise.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago
  1. How did he pay all that money while in prison?
  2. Where are you getting your facts about Ross from besides your ass?
[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 62 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

"The scum that worked to convict him were some of the same lunatics who were involved in the modern day weaponization of government against me."

He called Ulbricht's prison sentence "ridiculous."

I clearly recall Trump being president from 2016-2020, Ulbricht was sentenced to life without parole in 2015.

If it was so ridiculous, why didn't he pardon him on his first term? What changed to make it such an immediate priority now?

[–] Podunk@lemmy.world 35 points 8 hours ago

Because he needed the libertarian vote this time in order to win. Its a very cheap promise that guarantees votes and doesnt alienate anyone that doesnt care. Honestly, the fact that he followed through suprises me.

"But why didnt he need the libertarian vote in 16?"

Because he never intended to win the first time. The first run was a fluke. He wanted to play victim and run the media circuit for profit.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Back then he thought Bitcoin was bad and a scam. This time someone showed him how to make money by creating a scam coin and doing a pump and dump, so now he's pro Bitcoin. So pro he'll get rid of all regulation so pump and dump scams are completely legal.

[–] parody@lemmings.world 6 points 8 hours ago

Imagine how many times he was asked:

“Why don’t you have your own “Bitcoin” coin yet, Mr. President?”

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 27 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I remember this guy being a fucking idiot that paid for several fake assassinations of fake rivals. It was pretty funny.

[–] owl@infosec.pub 25 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It is funny in hindsight, knowing the assassinations were a scam. But he thought they were real, he talked in great detail about them and payed for them. This is missing from the article, I believe it was part of his indictment.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Oh yeah, he's a piece of shit for sure. I just think it's funny that he's also a moron. What kind of drug lord gets a message saying "Hey, I heard of a guy who wants to take you down, wire me a cool mil and I'll kill him for you, k?" and just... sends the money? More than once?! He definitely tried to rescue an overthrown Nigerian prince as a kid.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 31 minutes ago

Don’t forget, he was caught because he posted his email in a public forum while advertising the Silk Road. That email address contained his real name.

Yeah, when I watched a synopsis of the story, multiple alarm bells rang in my head midway through watching it. He's so gullible for how rich he fucking was

So the twist that was that they were all the same person, didn't even surprise me, you could see that it was a scam a mile away if you were paying attention

The scammer was pretty good, though, I will give them that. Too bad the scammer was also pretty dumb about how the handle the money after the fact, and got caught lmao.

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 85 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Trump said he had called Ulbricht’s mother to tell her he would pardon her son “in honor of her and the Libertarian Movement, which supported me so strongly”.

Wildy transactional.

So... does "full and unconditional" mean he's also pardoned for the murders-for-hire? Or just for being a drug lord and America's Next Top Website Boy?

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 points 6 hours ago

He was never convicted on murders for hire, charges were dropped

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 32 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I'm actually kind of impressed he kept his word. That's unexpected

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 24 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 33 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, it's insane that he's just openly being like, "I promise to use the powers of my office to solely benefit myself," and the Supreme Court's just like, "Get it, grrrrrl"

Although, to be fair, it did also benefit a guy who tried to murder five people.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Could someone explain like to an non American why the president gets to pardon people at all?

If someone committed a crime they're guilty, if there's new evidence that they're not guilty then that's what appeals are for.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 21 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

In a perfect system, the pardon is meant to be a "check" on the powers of the other branches. (Legislative and judicial). Each branch is meant to both support AND check the others.

Obviously we are watching it all unwind. Certain things were a "gentleman's agreement" in that a president normally wouldn't over do it and just pardon tons of people. We are finding out lots of things were just assumed to be ok, but are easily abused by bad actors

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That kinda makes sense, but aren't some of your top judges appointed by the president. Which would mean the office of the president automatically has 2/3 of the things under their control.

[–] TacoSocks@infosec.pub 2 points 2 hours ago

Congress/Senate has to confirm judge appointments, but they mostly rubber stamp the appointments if the Senate is the same party as the president.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (4 children)

My best understanding is that it was a historic right of kings, governors, etc. The idea was to show mercy to those who may have been convicted wrongly, or to people convicted of laws that have been overturned.

Trump is abusing it in ways never done before to payback political supporters.

TBF Biden abused it as well in pardoning his son.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 52 minutes ago (1 children)

Carter's blanket pardon of Vietnam War draft dodgers was pretty important

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 30 minutes ago

Yes - exactly. That's the sort of high-minded use that I believe the framers were considering.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Sounds like a rule that very much should have been left in the 17th century

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 6 points 7 hours ago

Just FYI this is not just an American thing. In Italy for example the President of the republic can cancel or amend sentences too, and it does happen relatively often, although not in the same partisan way as in the US (but that's also because the president in Italy is a neutral and representative position).

Some example from few years ago when the president graced 33 people (each with a specific articulated motivation) https://www.ilpost.it/2021/12/10/mattarella-grazia-sette-persone-sebastian-oberleteir-heinrich/ (in Italian, but you can translate if you wish).

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 50 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, holy fuck, I never thought it'd happen. Even a broken clock is right twice a day I guess.

This dude is about to have a very lucrative career.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

You're saying it's the right move to release a man convicted of (I believe) several counts of attempted murder?

[–] NautiNolana@lemmy.world 2 points 43 minutes ago (1 children)

Absolutely, free Ross.

I’m not a trump fan

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 33 minutes ago

The dude's a clown. Get better role models.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 54 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Tough on drugs... For people who aren't white

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Probably made a deal and wants all his Bitcoin. Smart kid, you know it's hidden somewhere. Thank God he's out there double life without parole. It's inhumane.

Not to mention that undercover basically set him up to look bad.

[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

If he didn't wanna look bad he shouldn't have sent a person he believed to be a hitman $300,000 to murder someone.

[–] owl@infosec.pub 4 points 7 hours ago

How was he set up to look bad?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Don't know or care about this guy but all drugs should be legal.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›