this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
658 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

60604 readers
3253 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

The 8200 division at Meta working overtime

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 hours ago

This is why we gotta ban TikTok!!!!! \s

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 25 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

“lobbing”

is this a trusted outlet? at least we can be pretty sure a human wrote it ha ha ha

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I would also like to lob Congress.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 5 hours ago

please give me the lobbing machine 🙏

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Well it is called readsludge.com

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 6 hours ago

right?!? lol

i know mbfc isnt the best but: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sludge/

Bias Rating: LEFT Factual Reporting: HIGH Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

…so…. maybe? maybe its fine idk

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 36 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Well we knew it had to be something. I mean most of Congress is too old to know what a tik tok is.

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

They’re just too old for everything. They’re almost part of ancient history.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago

Tic Tac Toe!

[–] arbitrary_sarcasm@lemmy.world 62 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Media headlines that use the word lobbying probably do it so that people don't take up arms. If they were to instead call it bribery, I think a lot more people would take issue with the whole process.

[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 28 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

they can't really do that because that would be defamation and they would be sued for it. Bribery is a crime and while it is effectively the same as lobbying from our perspective, one is legal and one is not and a media outlet can't just accuse someone of a crime without evidence unless they want to close up shop

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 43 minutes ago

How about ~~legal bribery~~ lobbying

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

When in practice Corruption is not investigated or prosecuted, nobody ever gets convicted of Corruption, the Media can't talk about Corruption as it would otherwise be defamation, hence the country has no Corruption.

I haven't lived in the US but I lived in the UK and this was exactly how Britain had "no Corruption".

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Except the only thing that will be prosecuted, or adjudicated, is the claim of libel entered by Meta, for suggesting their millions are anything other than legal contributions to something or other.

There is a solution, though, staring us all right in the face.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

Just like how ABC paid/donated $15 million for reporting an unpleasant fact about the preaident-elect.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Yeah.

Those of us paying attention have spotted long ago that the Ju$tice System is mainly a tool for violent enforcement of the power of the moneyed and well-connected elites on the majority of the population behind a charade of "rules are rules" and it being just an independent and a fair mechanism for equal application of the "rules defined by Society" to all (all of which is nowadays and in a painlfully obvious way, clearly a bundle of lies).

All it takes is comparing how the Ju$tice System reacts to merelly the peons breaching uneven contracts with big companies or to the occupation of the property of the very wealthy by the poor, compared to how it reacts to violent crime in poor neighbourhoods, to see how their Ju$tice is not in any way form or shape Fair or Just.

Maybe it's less so in some countries and more so in others, but nowhere is it actually fair and independent.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 172 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Shit, we should also ban insta, fb, and google places while we’re at it.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Just force them to use open standards and for it to be easy for people to move platform whilst keeping all the connections to their profile: the power of such social media entities is that people are locked-in because if they move they lose the connections of both followers and those they follow, which often means family and friends.

Basically a solution similar to that adopted in Europe for phone numbers - that you can take your number with you when you move providers - would reduced social media companies down to "just a pipe for social media connectivity" which would ultimatelly kill those with the worst practices given that the barrier to entry to be a "social media provider" is way lower than to be a fixed line telephony provider.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 day ago (7 children)

The reason we have a Chinese competitor that we cannot directly control is that Meta is buying up every promising US platform and shutting it down. Or just trying to copy it so that the competitor does not get enough users

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›