this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
457 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

60342 readers
5948 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Landmark legislation sees the Australian government committed to the novel step of child protection by banning social media for under sixteens.

(page 2) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 17 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

What happens if an Australian kid starts running their own Pixelfed or Lemmy site?

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 14 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

My instance is in Australia, and the new laws affect social media like Lemmy. The hard part is that there apparently isn't much guidance on how to follow the law. Do you have to use ID? Is a location-specific popup making you state that you're 16+ enough? Nobody knows.

I think a mastodon instance started asking aussies to send a pic of them with a bottle of vodka or a pack of smokes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

We are yet to see. My guess is they charge the kid for providing social media to an underaged user (themselves). Will be very interesting to watch ngl. Also idk how they gonna implement it cos i sure as shit aint handing over my id to the social media companies.

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 6 points 7 hours ago

I'm not sure that a self hosted ActivityPub site with a single user could reasonably be called a social media site. I wonder how the law defines a social media site.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The Australian government is to cowardly to regulate social media to be healthy for all ages.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HowAbt2morrow 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Fair dinkem mate. How are they gonna regulate this?

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Are they still allowed on Lemmy?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago

I'm just waiting until they remember why borders are a thing that exists.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

this isn't for the safety of kids; it's to eliminate the ability for queer kids to find a community.

[–] CTDummy@lemm.ee 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

No offence but that’s shortsighted to be generous. I feel like half of lemmy will carry on about social media being cancer, the frequent articles citing negative effects of SM on mental health and the fact that multiple social media companies are accused of propagating misinformation (Zuckerberg face sure is in lemmy a lot lately for some reason). Like Zuck has all but greenlit harassing lgbt+ people on FB and the SM ban is to stop gay kids finding a community? Please. Corporate SM is a blight and before someone says lemmy/reddit check the mod logs or the fact that lemmy only got CSAM under control relatively recently before suggesting it’s fine for kids.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Absolute stupidity and a waste of taxpayers' money spending so much time on this nonsense.

These incompetent morons are pretty much guaranteeing that they will lose the next election. In the middle of a housing and inflation crisis this is what these fuckheads decided was important.

I loathe the opposition, but it's hard to defend the sheer incompetence the Labor Party has displayed their entire term.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I am so, so glad to see that at least one country in the world is willing to tackle this problem.

Also a little depressed that every comment thread about this law boils down to: "It's hard. Might as well not do it at all," especially from people who (rightly) think we need to ban guns every time a school gets shot up here in the US, which would be monumentally difficult socially but 100% needs to happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›