this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
337 points (99.7% liked)

News

23786 readers
4379 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Knowing who does and who doesn't want their data collected is just another data point.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 57 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Unless Google is fined $10 billion, this means nothing.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

Depends on the jurisdiction and the case specifics. In europe, under GDPR the consequence we (my employer) are the most terrified about is an injunction to stop any further processing of given data for a purpose that would be deemed illegitimate.

You’re not coming back from that one…

And that would typically be on top of the fine which would be to some extent « cost of doing business » indeed.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It means the cost of doing business. The judge will likely be limited in his judgment by some antiquated cap on how much they can fine.

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 18 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Un the EU, fines are up to 6% of annual revenues.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 15 points 11 hours ago

The actual cap of punishment for repeat offenders is a forced breakup, or "structural remedies".

[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Google, as the judge writes, purports to treat user data as pseudonymous by creating a randomly generated identifier that "permits Google to recognize the particular device and its later ad-related behavior... Google insists that it has created technical barriers to ensure, for (s)WAA-off users, that pseudonymous data is delinked to a user's identity by first performing a 'consent check' to determine a user's (s)WAA settings."

I don’t buy for even a single second that “pseudonymous” identifier numbers aren’t linked to other data and other identifying numbers. Big tech is willing to create shadow accounts even if you aren’t a user. They will absolutely link whatever data they have to you, then deny it later, call the lawyers, and have them claim a computer magic defense in court.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 31 points 17 hours ago

“We don’t store your name. The only data that’s even close to that would be your height, weight, address, medical history, a handful of biomarkers, your family member’s names, and a few other things that totally can’t be tied back to you!” - Google probably

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 hours ago

and have them claim a computer magic defense in court.

And what do you know, the black box that is AI is perfect for this...

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 7 points 17 hours ago

Who can say how the jury is going to decide, but I wouldn't want to be in Google's position. It's easy to imagine a reasonable juror feeling exactly how the judge felt.