You'd have to be willfully ignorant of context, history and systemic power dynamics to think misandry is a threat to men in the same way misogyny is a threat to... well, everyone.

all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Eco@hexbear.net 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

is a pumpkin spice latte a form of misandry?

[–] Ocommie63@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

New site tagline

[–] Eco@hexbear.net 0 points 10 months ago

i've spent years being the greatest and funniest poster on the bear site and i've never achieved a tagline

the fascist mods are censoring me

[–] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If misandry isn't real then why do I hate men? Checkmate liberal

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 1 points 10 months ago

How can misandry be real when men aren't real? They're just a lie made up by the industry to sell us bigger pants.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Wtf is up with the random ass outbreak of incelivitis?

Are the men on this site ok? Do I need to post some Stavros Halkias clips?

[–] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 1 points 10 months ago

The easiest way to weed out any form of reactionary sentiment is to call out that kind of sentiment and then bring the hammer down. We've seen this in earlier purges like the pronoun struggles, you can observe the same thing every time in any space where somebody brings up a topic reactionaries find "controversial". People with the views that are called out will feel offended and double down, and it's always in really obvious, blatantly mask off ways. When i've seen misogyny on this site before, it was usually a lot more vague and between the lines, now we have posters outright saying chud shit like

examples from the mod log

"misandrist drivel" or "women who are free to date who they want are an existential threat to me" or "nonbinary people can't be lesbians".