this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
73 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

34987 readers
395 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] somegadgetguy@lemdro.id 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[–] Wrongleverkrunk@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

Fuck Samsung

[–] Kushia@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Sounds like the OPEC method of price fixing to me.

[–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

I was looking to buy a samsung ssd. Looks like i will shop elsewhere then.

Not that voting with your wallet does anything. The action samsung is taking here should be illegal.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


According to a recent report via TrendForce, the NAND flash market will soon break away from its trend of decreasing prices.

Samsung's solution is to induce a supply-side shock by cutting NAND output by as much as 50% (mainly on processes under 128 layers).

When supply is artificially capped, the higher demand will slowly push stocks lower, increasing the sales price.

That's the mechanism Samsung is leveraging to stem the bleeding prices of NAND, which has seen a severe decline in the last year.

In its current state, AI workloads require somewhat disproportionate compute as GPU and CPU power is much more critical to performance than having a quick, hot-storage solution.

The gold rush for Nvidia GPUs (and their cost, which has led Nvidia to lock-in some 823% in profit percentage) also brings opportunity cost with it: spending money on GPUs leaves less money available for more "classical" supercomputing systems.


The original article contains 418 words, the summary contains 150 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It's cheaper to just run everything off thumb drives from the cash register area.