this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
190 points (97.0% liked)

Open Source

31365 readers
167 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 60 points 1 year ago

As someone who’s been in the industry in San Francisco since the mid-’90s, he speaks to my lived experience.

Tech workers dreamed of working for a big company for a few years before striking out on their own to start their own business that put that big company out of business. Then that dream shrank to working for a tech giant for a few years, quitting, and doing a fake startup to get aquihired back by your own boss and the world's most inefficient way to get a raise. And then it shrank even further to working for a tech giant for your whole life but there'd be free kombucha in the cafeteria and you get massages on Wednesdays. And now that dream is over, and all that's left is work for a tech guy until they fire your ass, like those 12,000 Googlers who got fired six months after a stock buyback that would have paid their salaries for the next 27 years.

[–] WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fantastic talk. Unfortunately, the last question was spot on - Cory's ideas require political action.

But that political process is corrupted by the very companies we need action against.

[–] z3n0x@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

"self regulating bodies"

[–] elouboub@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

These are pie in the sky plans. I thought he was going to come up with a technical solution.

[–] andruid@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Political action can happen, and probably needs to happen, so I am glad there are at least some still pushing for it. It's up to the rest of us to make it a technical reality though.

[–] z3n0x@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

let's see what the Digital Markets Act will accomplish. it's a slow process for sure ...

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 10 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/watch?v=rimtaSgGz_4

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] i_am_somebody@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The topic is very interesting to me but the video is almost an hour long with no slides. Does anybody have a transcript or outline of the talk?

I'm not trying to troll or be sarcastic. I'd really appreciate the option to skim it without having to watch the full video. Thanks a lot!

[–] z3n0x@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this talk is basically a short version of Cory's new book. To get a gist of it, check out reviews like: https://apnews.com/article/internet-con-doctorow-book-review-9a5645c075fa495f701481d50f3917c8

[–] i_am_somebody@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

Thanks a lot!

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You could say “encrudification” if you’re worried about typing bad words on the internet.

[–] z3n0x@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

you know what, I didn't even notice (just copied from video). Title edited.

[–] Nihilore@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

People having to self censor on the internet to appease advertisers is just another part of enshittification

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The issue is corruption. Plans like this may succeed in EU but it's too late for US. With the supreme court being filled with millionaires' puppets, religious fanatics and rapists for the next 20 years no meaningful change will happen.