this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
223 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

60059 readers
3316 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lukstru@lemmy.world 49 points 4 days ago
[–] 3aqn5k6ryk@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Im shocked. Well, not that shocked.

[–] espentan@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Surprisingly, I'm not shocked at all. Heck, I'm not even surprised I'm not shocked.

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Apple has said it "strongly disputes" the ~~minerals~~ claims and that it is "deeply committed to ~~armed conflict~~ responsible sourcing" of minerals.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What an incredibly PC word for BLOOD DIAMONDS! I’m sure the world will be a much safer place downplaying that or if you prefer BLOOD MINERALS. But conflict minerals doesn’t exactly sound as hostile as it should.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 5 points 3 days ago

Well, they're talking about "tin, tantalum and tungsten", not diamonds, so that part makes sense. They did water down the title compared to the article where they describe them as "blood minerals" though, you're right about that.

[–] Easton89@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Why they do that?