this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
498 points (97.2% liked)

memes

10667 readers
2195 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(Has anyone posted this yet?)

Obligatory: I didn't create this, I #yaRRR'ed πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ it from the other site

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hupf@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago

Mimic octopus.

[–] aeharding@vger.social 51 points 5 days ago (3 children)
[–] aeharding@vger.social 38 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh also

I keep seeing Starlink pics claimed as drones…

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago

Drone:

The Maryland governor actually posted a picture saying he was worried about drones and it was orion's belt with a couple other stars in the picture.

https://www.newsweek.com/mystery-drones-restricted-areas-2002176

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Happy Wheels is just all drones?

πŸ§‘β€πŸš€πŸ”«πŸ§‘β€πŸš€

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)
[–] aeharding@vger.social 10 points 5 days ago (3 children)

It’s supposed to be purple. I’m the voyager dev πŸ€“

[–] kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

Oh sick, thanks!

Ohhhh, I've seen you around and wondered what your name color meant. Maybe you should show why a name is colored a certain way when you click a username?

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I'm not even American and even I have figured that a lot of that shit seems to be being push by the Republican party.

Instead of "bread and circus" they are just giving you "aliens and Iran".

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Gotta whip up the hate so we can justify Iraq War 3. Wouldn't be surprised if we get a bunch of new Chinese Balloon Invasion and Mexican Border Crisis hysteria in the next year, as well, since we want to pick fights with both of them.

Americans are the most propagandized people on earth. We have the tools to get them to believe just about anything, simply be saturating their eyeballs and ear holes with terror.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Mexican Border Crisis hysteria in the next year

No, no, no, don't be silly!

The migrant caravans aren't scheduled to come until one month before the next midterm. We have at least two years before we hear about that one again.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Trump has already been spitballing military intervention in Mexico "to fight the cartels", like we don't already provide Mexico with a ton of anti-insurgent trainers and totally-not-special-ops guys who totally do not do violence in-country.

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

The absolute best part is...it's USA. The moment your military gets actually slight spook, of the you know, short gasp variety...you know it because your military complex temporarily forgets limits of today's technology and produces some sci-fi shit. And yet ya all are still able to be made to be scared of... looks into his book Mexico and...Iran...

Remember the poors killing that sweet, innocent healthcare denier? Well, DON'T!

LOOK! DRONES!

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt, it's the same FUD tactics the wealthy have used for decades to distract from the real problems that should have been resolved decades ago.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If I see cold war migs doing low altitude passes I'm calling somebody lol

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Bottom mid is an SU-37. Which would be slightly more alarming.

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Am I do this right?

[–] rovingnothing29@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

Someone in Maine seems to have failed to ID the moon last week, so Jersey isn't doing so bad.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Where did all these drones come from? Well, when an Iranian mothership and an Iranian fathership love each other very much...

[–] elbowgrease@lemm.ee 10 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I guess the army doesn't know a drone from a plane then? the following comes from the DOD.

_We have had confirmed sightings at Picatinny Arsenal and Naval Weapons Station Earle," the spokesperson said

"To date, we have no intelligence or observations that would indicate that they were aligned with a foreign actor or that they had malicious intent," the spokesperson said. "But ... we don't know. We have not been able to locate or identify the operators or the points of origin." _

https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/4002374/joint-staff-addresses-drones-over-new-jersey-military-installations/

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 11 points 5 days ago (4 children)

"We have had confirmed sightings at Picatinny Arsenal and Naval Weapons Station Earle," the spokesperson said. "This is not a new issue for us. We've had to deal with drone incursions over our bases for quite a time now. It's something that we routinely respond to in each and every case when reporting is cited."

It's not explicitly stated, but my read is they get normal consumer-style quadcopters regularly, and this is simply a continuation of that. Perhaps an increase because people are now trying to explicitly spy on the military.

The public drone sightings, on the other hand, definitely don't seem to be consumer quadcopters. They mostly look suspiciously like 737s, V-22s, or out of focus stars.

load more comments (4 replies)

we have no intelligence or observations (..) we don't know. We have not been able to locate or identify

They have no clue by their own admission.

To claim that what amounts to a literal UFO might belong to a hostile actor just because you don't know that it doesn't is irresponsible at best, scaremongering jingoism at worst.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Crazy how you can have a budget in the trillions for national security but "Idk, maybe their not unfriendly? We need another six months to look into it" is the best our top military brass can come up with.

Really makes you think about how easy 9/11 was to pull off.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's like trying to disprove Bigfoot. Someone comes to you with a shaky, out of focus video with no audio, time, date, or precise location.

I can't prove it's not bigfoot. That doesn't mean I think it is Bigfoot, or that you should think so.

If you have good video and know where it was shot from and can cross-reference that with aircraft trackers? Then maybe they can do a good investigation. There's been a few of those where it turns out to pretty obviously be a helicopter, a V-22, or just a 737.

Especially since it's rather hard to judge scale on airborne things some distance away.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I can’t prove it’s not bigfoot.

I mean, its trivial to prove something isn't Bigfoot on the grounds that Bigfoot Isn't Real. That's just Hitchens's Razor. The burden of proof is on the person presenting the claim, not the one refuting it.

Especially since it’s rather hard to judge scale on airborne things some distance away.

A bunch of the sightings have literally just been stars in the night sky.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean, its trivial to prove something isn’t Bigfoot on the grounds that Bigfoot Isn’t Real. That’s just Hitchens’s Razor. The burden of proof is on the person presenting the claim, not the one refuting it.

Shifting the burden of proof doesn't disprove the claim. You can look at a picture and call someone an idiot for believing it's bigfoot/a drone, but still not be able to swear that there is no way it could possibly be a drone.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Shifting the burden of proof doesn’t disprove the claim.

It eliminates the concern. NASA isn't setting it's launch schedule against the possibility of a vessel colliding with Russell's Tea Pot, because there's simply no evidence it exists.

You can look at a picture and call someone an idiot for believing it’s bigfoot/a drone

If I hand you a blank piece of paper and tell you it's a photograph of a Yeti, you aren't obligated to prove I'm wrong.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. The military isn't obligated to look at every single picture and tell you that it's not a drone. But if they don't do that, they can't say "we have looked at every single picture and confirmed there are no suspicious drones".

The military is rightly refusing to prove a negative.

The military is rightly refusing to prove a negative.

Unfortunately, a lot of camera hogs and attention seekers are playing up the "Well but maybe it was aliens who can truly say? I just think its weird and our department needs another billion dollars to investigate" angle in front of Congress. Then they do the podcast/C-list national news circuit and whisper "It's definitely aliens" into the mic for the most gullible of the rubes.

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The "with props" implies that all the other ~~planes~~ drones dont have props. All hail the prop-less Cesena!

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago

Put the toy quad copters you can get at Costco on there

[–] Jode@midwest.social 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

747 F16 Piper Comanche

A320 Mig 15 AN2

737 Russian thing RV4

Concord F35 C172

777 SU27? RV6A

Fokker tri motor Caravan?

[–] Vuraniute@thelemmy.club 3 points 5 days ago

Looks like a MiG-29 to me

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

NCD would like to know your location.

[–] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

Well if they are unmanned they are technically drones. How can you tell from so far away and the middle of the night and with a crappy recording device.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Which one is the goddamn Batman?

[–] Bobblegagger@mastodon.world 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

@IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol
I don't see any indigenous birds on this list

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They do. They're just drones, tho.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

That's because they're all dead

[–] M137@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

The Iranian mothership should be a drone, would be funnier IMO.

Or is the image for that something specific? Been too busy playing the India Jones game all day so I've missed news etc.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί