this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
205 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2487 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ClockNimble@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago

The "Brain damage made me conservative" guy weighing in again.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago

What a piece of shit, pardoning Trump would do nothing to slow him down from destroying every social advancement made since 1920.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

That's not Fetterman, Fetterman died.

[–] Old_Yharnam@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

This dude needs to be ‘primaried’ back to the stone age.

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

Unfortunately the other option was Oz.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Disgusting. Fuck this dude.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

This matches up with him saying "good night" as his very first line in that debate.

That was an oopsie, but now he seems to have taken the conservative route of, identify with saying the opposite of reality instead of getting better at stating reality.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 135 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fucking Class traitor. Coyote in sheep's clothing.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

https://www.inquirer.com/politics/election/john-fetterman-black-jogger-2013-shotgun-20220425.html

In 2013, Fetterman pursued a man and pulled a shotgun on him because he wrongly believed the man, who turned out to be a Black jogger, had been involved in a shooting.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 16 points 6 days ago

Miyares also told The Inquirer their encounter shouldn’t stop Fetterman from becoming a senator.

“Even with everything I said, it is inhumane to believe one mistake should define a man’s life,” Miyares wrote in one of two letters sent to The Inquirer. “I hope he gets to be a Senator.” (That last line was underlined three times.)

Miyares didn’t expect Fetterman to change his account.

“Telling the truth on an incident 10 years ago could cause him more harm than good,” Miyares wrote. “Mr. Fetterman and his family have done far more good than that one bad act or action and, as such, should not be defined by it.”

He signed that letter: “Gooo Fetterman.”

Took an interesting turn. And then another right away

Where is Miyares now?

Miyares wrote to The Inquirer in response to a letter seeking his side of the story. Miyares is serving an 18- to 36-month sentence after being convicted in 2019 of kidnapping, terroristic threats, unlawful restraint, and other crimes against a woman who hired him for a ride to work.

According to the criminal complaint, the victim told investigators Miyares pulled out a knife after asking her a series of personal questions, driving a route not in the direction of her job, and locking all the car doors. She forced her door open, escaped, and flagged down nearby drivers for help as Miyares drove off. He later sent her a text message saying he knew where she lived and worked.

Wtf

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is who he's always been, but liberals were blinded by the D in front of his name and chose to ignore the shit he did before getting elected.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yes he sucks now, but your lazy take is revisionist history.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 83 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

His noggin seems to be fully healed after his stroke: he's now a fully-functional politician once again, with perfectly working lying, backstabbing, flip-flopping and sycophantic brain functions.

Wish we all had access to this level of healthcare so we could all go back to performing our job to the fullest of our abilities like he does.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 80 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

He just can't stop being fuckwit. He's just another Manchin and just needs to become a Republican and GTFO.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He ran around calling himself progressive and talking about all the progressive stuff the country needs...

But all it took was a stroke and a little brain damage for him to go full maga, now he honestly and repeatedly says he doesn't understand why people ever thought he was progressive.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I think the brain damage made him forget that he was willfully lying about being progressive.

[–] caveman8000@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Karjalan@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

See the "some more news" video on this guy. He was probably conservative all along but hid it well till recently

[–] buttfarts@lemy.lol 1 points 6 days ago

Not bad enough apparently. It would have been better for us if he wasn't active politically anymore.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 60 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He was never a democrat, people just love a scammer. He his that, passed a lot of money through his organization.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He was though, in his presentation at least. I still remember him giving this interview in front of a Wawa off the freeway when he was first gaining national prominence - message that felt so strongly progressive yet could be so really absorbed by the broader population.

Fetterman died from that stroke, this is John NOTOURman

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

He seemed more like a maga person when he chased a black for going on a run.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

At the height of the presidential election campaign, I got down voted for pointing out at Fetterman and Tulsi Gabbard as examples that there are Democrats who flip, because they rail on "vote blue no matter who". After Trump won his second term, I don't see those die-hard types anymore. They finally admit that the Democratic party is compromised through and through, and that only a progressive takeover of the party will solve the problems that arose.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 8 points 6 days ago

the Democratic party is compromised through and through

Always has been.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The problem is people are trying to beat republicans by being just like them. Republicans stand or kill their own. That created Trump, dems want to do the samething. Normal people need to start running again and need support.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The days of trying to court both sides and moderates have long gone past. It now requires more radical changes. If Democrats indeed want to win again, they have to go further left. The Republicans have rightly deduced that people want drastic change so they are unafraid to go further right (probably also because of influence from the Tea Party movement). Democrats need to go more populist like the Republicans have.

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

They don't need to "win". The money keeps coming either way.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If Democrats indeed want to win again, they have to go further left.

The basic problem is that the Democratic Party isn't at all inclined to go left. The people who run it and fund it want a centre-right party to be the only alternative to the far-right party. Left-wing politics doesn't funnel the money to where they want it to be. So the best they can do is tease people with a vague promise of progressivism, in order to win votes, but with no real intention or commitnent to deliver on it.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Problem is, the nightmare scenario of a second Trump term has already arrived. I don't know if there will be further elections, I assume there will be and act as such. If there are then guess what? The nightmare is already here, and the disaster is already actively destroying the country, so tax credits for starting a small business or whatever the fuck aren't cutting it anymore. I want actual governmental reform.

They can either go left or they can fuck right off. Absolutely nobody will buy the "most important election of our lifetimes" bullshit again after whatever happens next year.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

There will continue to be elections. They just won't be free and fair, particularly in states with Republican control.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

Well let's hope it wakes them up. I'm sure there are senior Democrats thinking, "Trump will make a mess and anger people, so we'll just ride this out until we can get reelected then back to business as usual." And "He won't abolish/undermine elections -that's just talk." Some of them will never learn, because they deeply don't want to.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wouldn't be upset if he had another stroke at this point.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its funny how brain injury tends to turn people right.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No it doesn’t. I had a TBI and went further left.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

maybe it has to be combined with excess money.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

Well I definitely don’t have that lol

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Maybe it will fix whatever got broke the first time

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago

At least now he seems to be being honest and telling us the kind of shitty person he really is

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

This, ladies and gentlemen, is what grievance politics leads to. Cenk*, Anna, Fetterman, Dore, etc, when you think of criticism as competition to get to the top, or you think of one person's success as a lack of your own, the only path is towards right wing grift.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Still better than Oz would have been.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure but that's like saying "at least it's not pancreatic cancer" when you have a brain tumor.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 week ago

at least it’s not pancreatic cancer

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I almost wonder if things would have been better if Oz did get elected. Like when Massachusetts elected Scott Brown but then replaced him with Elizabeth Warren.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›