this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
59 points (88.3% liked)

Technology

74961 readers
2725 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Webb finds molecule only made by living things in another world::undefined

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A chemical only produced by life on earth. But can it be produced by abiotic conditions on other planets? I’m not sure that has been ruled out at this point.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 years ago

Yeah, this headline is bullshit. It's indication of possible life, but it isn't what the headline makes it sound. There's always other possible methods, even if we aren't aware of them yet. It's interesting, but doesn't confirm anything yet.

[–] FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Only a 1 sigma confirmation at the moment so needs to be thoroughly reinvestigated

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

It’s a number that statistically represents how strong the result is in the data basically. As far as I understand it, with astronomy the typical sigma value expected is 3

[–] Kingcong@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

By saying 1 sigma, they are basically saying tgat are 68% confident in the results. As you increase the sigma, your confidence in the results increases. Here is a site that goes into more in depth explanation: https://news.mit.edu/2012/explained-sigma-0209#

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

it picked up hints of a substance only made by living things — at least, that is, on Earth.

What other process could theoretically produce it?

[–] Dani551@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

Given the vast differences in atmospheres (or the lack thereof) and their conditions, I wouldn't be surprised if those were the culprits

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

if you have methanol, hydrogen sulfide and enough heat along with a specific rock, it will get formed. or probably methane, hydrogen sulfide and UV

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

there are many ways, and what i'm saying it's likely a massive clickbait

t. organic chemist, currently working with sulfur compounds

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I would also hesitate to automatically rule anything out. The Fermi paradox exists for a reason, and it makes logical sense that if life can appear in one place, it can (and will) do it again. In a universe as large as ours, it's basically inevitable that we will eventually discover some form of alien life, even if it's just single-celled organisms (assume we as a species survive long enough).

I just wanted to throw my 2 cents in because whenever anything like this comes up, you get a rush of two kinds of people: "omg aliens!" and "omg look at all the idiots who thinks it's aliens; everyone knows aliens aren't real". It frustrates me because the existence of alien life shouldn't be controversial. If anything, imo, the idea that alien life doesn't exist should be controversial (the Fermi paradox exists for a reason). Just because we haven't seen it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It's honestly scarier imo if it doesn't exist due to the implications of it.


someone who woulda probably been an astrophysicist if they'd been given a chance earlier in life

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

i said nothing about aliens, all i say is that claim "dimethyl sulfide = definite sign of life" makes it a powerful clickbait, because there are processes that can provide it abiogenically from something similar to earth's primordial soup

your assumption seems overly optimistic

[–] JaymesRS@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago
[–] M500@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sadly they cannot be communicated with in a single human life time; assuming they are intelligent and possess the capability to respond.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago

It's a planet 8x the mass of the earth with a heavy hydrogen atmosphere and is considered very hot, the water is in a super critical state. I think if we found anything it would just be bacterial life.

My bet is on "previously unknown chemistry" creating the chemicals we found. It's never aliens :(

[–] Chriszz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To me it’s not a matter of whether live exists anymore, but where it exists

[–] Art3sian@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’d be pretty happy to put $100 right now on life being found on almost every planet and moon throughout the galaxy where liquid water exists.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Im seriously excited to get to Europa