If I had the choice ahead of time? No, I wouldn't choose to be born.
If it's a retroactive thing though, I wouldn't undo my birth
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
78 points (93.3% liked)
Asklemmy
44152 readers
1438 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Absolutely.
If I'm just being asked to be born in a randomized way in a randomized location to a randomized family in randomized situations .... then no
If I had a choice of where, when and what circumstances I would like to be born in? ... then yes I would like those odds better and would like to be born.
Do I get a vision of my entire life, or do I just have to choose on a whim?
Choose on a whim
Do I have knowledge of when I will be born? And am I aware of the high and lows of the era?
You probably know when you were born
Yes,
Then my answer is No.
Humans have not yet reached a point in the entire history where they are deemed worthy of being part of.
If there is a point in the future where there is acceptance of all, fairness for all, and peace among all, then I would say yes.
That version of human will have the ultimate freedom.
Yes, but with better teeth.
I don't know what I would choose, I was just a little baby at the time
Yes. Alternative doesnβt actually exist, to some degree.
Even being able to process this question means some amount of knowledge to understand it.
Even then, yes. Every time. Existing is the best we know weβve got.
Yes. We have to persist through the horrors, thats just how it is on this bitch of an earth
Like, now? No way. I would choose to continue my unborn existence. However, if I could choose a time period, that would be a different story.
Maybe if I had the choice of where and when to be born. Much too risky to leave it up to chance though
Some religions -old and new - believe we choose the lessons we come to learn. If we learn quickly, we can advance to more advanced lessons, if we refuse or aren't capable of understanding our lessons, we repeat them, in one life or another. Just as settings, teachers and teaching styles vary, so do the subjective experiences and understanding of the lessons. Repeating them is karma. Demonstrating grasp and practical application is dharma. Choosing to incarnate to help others learn because one feels a deep empathy and compassion for everyone on the wheel of Samsara is bodhisattva.
Some of these religions believe we reincarnate until we have lived every experience from every possible perspective.
That said, back to my own cultural religious teachings, would I eat again from the tree of knowledge of good and evil? If I'm honest, on my worst days, no. On ok and best days? Yes. It's good to experience things from various perspectives. Our imaginations have been constrained and lack ability. Physical and intellectual exercise is the remedy.
Now? No.
If I had the choice I'd wait a century or two
only under certain conditions; mostly pertaining to wealth & vanity. lol
If it was before Iβd had my kids, probably. Now with my kids existing in the world, Iβd essentially be deleting their existences too, so no.
absolutely, I'm a fucking delight. Eudaemonia, baby!
Hard to say.
We all had a choice (well, maybe not ivf babies), we were just so dumb (single cell sperm) that the "choice" was not informed.
Not even true, contrary to popular belief it doesn't take one sperm cell in order to fertilize an egg it takes a bunch of sperm cells to fertilize an egg. This is why when men ejaculate they don't just ejaculate one sperm cell they ejaculate at least half a shot glass.
If a different sperm had won, I wouldn't be here.
Team effort or not, there is one success.
You've got a point. What was I thinking swimming to that egg?