So what’s controversial about it? This Sky News / Comcast rag mentions it’s “enormously” controversial without stating the controversies.
After reading about Tortoise media I’m kinda liking the slow news movement.
this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
32 points (97.1% liked)
United Kingdom
4138 readers
76 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Article says "scores" of journalists went on strike, I guess that's what they mean by that. "Scores" is a bit of a loaded term imo, it sounds like loads but a score is only 20
So doesn’t “loads of scores” mean multiples of 20?
Yeah, the article doesn't say "loads of", just "scores of journalists", so at least 40
I take it you're not from the UK?
I lived in the UK for a year, but no longer.
Apart from anything else nobody wants British institutions sold to American multinationals, only bad things can possibly come of that.
These things can be confusing to understand and seems like a reasonable question, I don't pretend to fully understand everyone's complaints.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortoise_Media
Doing basic research shows it as "a British news website", founded by a British journalist (who Murdoch didn't like so already sounds like a nice guy) and former head of the BBC, and an American who spent 4 years here as Ambassador under Obama.
Not exactly sounding like Bezos or Murdoch levels of evil here.
The main issue is that its all been dealt with in secret, consultations with Observer employees such as the editor haven't taken place so its just leaving a sour taste, along with a lot of questions as to how they reached contradictory positions on why they should sell the paper.