this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
282 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2375 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gnomesaiyan@lemmy.world 186 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Can the TVA please prune this fucking timeline already.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 61 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Trump is just nominating people he can remember or saw on TV at this point, isn't he?

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’ve heard it called his TV cabinet.

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

HA! Love it!

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago

If we have to rely on stuff he can remember we're gonna end up with a camera and a TV to be in charge of stuff (he's already put in a person, man, and woman).

"Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV."

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

He picked people that would work with him. Most people think he's a moron and difficult to work with so why waste their time. They are all washed up and trying to catch some sunlight to cash in on.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 112 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This must be how President Camacho comes to be.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 95 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Camacho at least was smart enough to know he wasn't that smart, and thus had the sense to listen to a particularly smart advisor who wasn't stupidly insane though!

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

Camacho apparently fixed the time machine and came back to run for president in 2024, because they forgot how to make cheese in the future.

Sadly he didn't get enough votes ☹️

https://youtube.com/watch?v=_RgG1Ayf4kI

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

Doubt it. He ranks low on the color chart.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Yeah. Idiocracy is indeed happening.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 86 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The amount of his picks that are involved with sexual abuse of minors seems pretty over-the-top even for a republican administration. At this point, do any of them not have histories of involvement with sexual abuse and/or harassment? Maybe Oz... idk.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Wrestling fan for over 40 years.

Honestly, given the options that Trump could dredge up from the 9th circle of hell, this isn't the worst choice.

Linda McMahon sat there for 50 or so years and did nothing while her husband committed all sorts of atrocities. And she deserves everything she gets for doing that. All the criticism surrounding that is 100% valid. But I want to point out the key words there. "Did nothing." Because that's pretty much Linda McMahon's resume.

As CEO, she did nothing. Vince called the shots. She just signed the paperwork -- at best. Her position was mainly a figurehead position just to ensure McMahon's power in the company was that much more entrenched. She has all the charisma and personality of cigarette ash, and her on-air persona was literally to sit in a wheelchair and say nothing because she wasn't capable of better acting.

She had a cabinet position during Trump's first administration, and did a whole lot more nothing.

I would expect the same thing here. Linda McMahon is an unqualified hack who shouldn't be in the position, but if there's a silver lining, it's this: Left to her own devices, McMahon will likely do nothing. Education won't get any better, but it won't get any worse either. She's smart enough to know when she has no idea what she's doing, and if the past 50 or so years is any indication, she'll spend the next four years doing a lot more nothing and hoping nobody notices.

Yes, she absolutely will follow Trump's directives to the letter. But Trump's attention span is worse than Linda McMahon's acting skills. I hate to say it like this, but if Trump stays focused on removing all the brown people and forcing his cronies to buy his watches, there's at least the possibility that McMahon could just keep her head down for 4 years and at least not leave the DOE worse off than the way she found it. She's got a 50 year resume showing her skills at doing nothing. Hopefully she'll continue that trend.

[–] dfecht@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (4 children)

There's a huge issue with that, though, that seems all too often overlooked: by doing nothing, our systems will still fall behind. They will continue to decay, to lag increasingly behind our peers and adversaries. At absolute best, the inevitable death of 1,000 cuts marches on.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, I think did nothing and let Vince do whatever he wanted while she signed the paperwork is the more relevant and scarier bit of what you're responding to and what that person missed. There's no silver lining to a Yes Man with what these people want to do to education.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

You're missing my point slightly.

Yes, if Trump is dead-set on killing the DOE, we're fucked. You're right there. But unlike many of Trump's other yes-men, Linda McMahon is not known to have the drive to do anything by herself. Go watch any of her WWE footage or any time she's made a public statement. That woman hasn't lifted a finger in her life without calling on her assistants to check on her nails. And we all know that Trump has the attention span of a methhead with ADHD. The silver lining is that if Trump decides to set his sights elsewhere, she'll do little damage on her own, unlike a more ambitious yes-man who will take the initiative.

Think of it this way. It could have been Boebert. Or MTG. Or Jim Jordan. Plenty of cronies exponentially worse than McMahon if they were chosen, and all of which would have the initiative to do it themselves if Trump's attention was focused elsewhere.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] skhayfa@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Could have been worse, last time it was Betsy Devos

[–] LaVacaMariposa@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I thought he was going to pick MTG or Boeboert, to be honest

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hulk Hogan and Dog The Bounty Hunter are going to be Co-Directors of National Intelligence

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You know what? Please. Don't even pretend this is not a joke anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure he'll get something. Looks like this time Trump is only looking for loyalty, his previous cabinet still had a ton of people that were only there because he felt he needed to keep McConnell happy. This time there's going to be no 'adults in the room'.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Why list her as a WWE executive but not list Trump as a WWE Hall of Famer?

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Bah Gawd It's Over! The DOE is dead! Broken in half!

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know what DOE employees did in a past life to deserve devos and whatever the fuck choice this is.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I dunno about their past lives either, but in this they made the eternal fuck up of wanting to impact American education at a time when the country was sliding into fascism.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Given that the US education system is wrestling with so many problems, maybe she is the right choice. /s

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 29 points 2 days ago

And there's the education grenade...

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Is anybody in the Republican party in the senate, congress or whichever not freaking out over his picks? Don't they have a final say?

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

When you swear ultimate fealty to a cult leader, the officers of the cult are by default the best picks. If you can't see it, it's a problem with you and not a problem with the cult leader.

Until those folk are no longer needed, outlive their usefulness, or turn on Trump of course. Then the handpicked officers in question were actually agents of "The Enemy" all along and needed to be purged.

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They confirmed her 81-19 for administrator of the Small Business Administration. That was dumb but they were ok with it then.

She was on the state board of education in Connecticut for a little over a year under their last GOP governor. So I guess that’s some experience at least. Totally qualified to run education for the entire fucking country.

🔥 This is fine. 🔥

The real danger is what Heritage Foundation ghouls will be running the show under her, and the other cabinet members. All these clowns are just the people Trump wants in the room with him. They don’t need to be qualified or do anything but kiss his ass on camera. It’s the Project 2025 deputy-weirdos we should worry about.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe if Trump really doesn't care about project 2025 and just keeps on going with his celebrity cabinet, then maybe they're going to fuck up so bad they're all doing to be ridiculed and Trump could be impeached over some incredible fuck up or fraud.

[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Haant he been impeached twice already? I don't think he cares

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Heard plenty of GOP noise against Gaetz, but that's about it.

And yes, Congress has the say unless Trump's people convince them to approve interim appointments. Even McConnell said, "Fuck that noise."

And now witness decades, like since the 50s decades, of the Legislative branch ceding power to the Executive. And here we are.

[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Didn't he want to abolish the education department? Or like is this how he wants to destroy it?

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Disgusting.

[–] Rageagainstbelief@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

It’s like he’s casting for the 9th circle of hell wow what a cast of characters.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

We are most definitely living in a simulation, shit is getting too weird to be real.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Only the best and brightest.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The McMahons are so weird.

It's kinda funny how Vince funded two failed campaigns, and the second the two seem to be estranged Linda has found political power through Trump.

I have no idea if Vince and Linda are still together, since they've been mostly separated for years now, but I wonder if this will also open doors for Vince considering he was booted out of TKO/WWE for the recent abus allegations.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ok so countdown to the article that finally proves he just has a dartboard with people's names on it that he likes and wherever the dart lands is the pick for the department...

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

It can't be that random. He surely picks the worst suited for the job.

load more comments
view more: next ›