this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
947 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

59518 readers
3197 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Happy birthday to Let's Encrypt !

Huge thanks to everyone involved in making HTTPS available to everyone for free !

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fiendishplan@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

I worked for a company we had 300 websites, the boss wanted to buy certs. I told him about Lets Encrypt. He loved the idea it saved us a bunch of money. I suggest we donate $100 to them. Hes says "NO F-ing way!".

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 149 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Man I love let's encrypt, remember how terrible ssl was before the project landed?

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 63 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Crazy times. Nowadays it's weird when a website doesn't have https. Back then it was pretty much big companies only. And the price of a wildcard certificate...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 30 points 3 days ago

I did not have the money to pay the insane amounts these greedy for-profit certificate authorities asked, so I only remember the pain of trying to setup my self-signed root certificate on my several devices/browsers, and then being unable to recover my private key because I went over the top with securing it.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 day ago

I remember the days when each site that wanted to use SSL had to have a dedicated IP.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And if you remember, that this whole shebang was only started, because Snowden revealed that the NSA spied on all of us, it's getting much much darker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] missphant@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I always had to fill out multiple pages of forms to get those free 1 year "trial" certs from startssl.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

Remember they wanted like $75 for certs? The gall.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kaotic@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A client of mine pays for an SSL cert he doesn’t even use. I’ve told him before I moved him to Let’s Encrypt because I was able to automate the renew process. He decided he needed to continue paying for the SSL cert. I told him we are not using it, but he doesn’t believe me. So he continues to pay for it.

[–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 1 day ago

TLS certificates have huge margins, so web hosts love selling them.

[–] pagenotfound@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I love it when companies are too stubborn to update their costs despite the necessity changing over the years.

My previous employment kept buying microsoft office license keys despite us already moving to 365. They probably did it out of habit when buying new computers. Needless to say I have a cardstack of license keys at home lol. Granted it’s for Office 2013 but I don’t really need the latest version for basic document processing.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Private sector is more efficient my ass

[–] specialseaweed@sh.itjust.works 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

SSL Certs were so god awful before certbot that it’s hard to explain now that it’s so easy and free.

[–] whome@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago

Also fucking expensive

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Just two months ago, a security team member dinged one of our services for using Lets Encrypt, as "it's not as secure as a traditional CA".

[–] bfg9k@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd love for them to explain how, if anything the short cert validity and constant re-checking of the domain seems more secure than traditional CAs

[–] dan@upvote.au 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'd also argue that the fact that it's 100% automated and their software is open source makes it objectively more secure. On the issuing side, there's no room for human error, social engineering, etc.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

It's sad that these arguments are still being shared. It was the same arguments years ago from people that would just assume that a free cert was inherently unsafe.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago

And it changed the Internet, for good and a lot.

[–] __matthew__@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

Lol I instinctively freaked out when I saw the post preview assuming it was going to be a post about a major data breach or exploit of some sort relating to Let's Encrypt.

I probably need more positivity in my life 😂

[–] JohnyRocket@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It doesn't say on the website but on their anniversary day they are giving away unlimited ssl certs!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nek0d3r@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (4 children)

And my parents still buy SSL certs because that's just what they know 🤢

[–] bfg9k@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My last cert renewal was $20 for 3 years. That's less than a dollar a month, not exactly breaking the bank.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] somenonewho@feddit.org 40 points 3 days ago

Damn! That's definitely a "I'm old" moment for me. I still remember when I first heard about the concept and I remember setting it up the first time on a self hosted project (which seemed harder back then).

Awesome project!

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

Lots of people shitting on stories of people who buy certs.

You do still have to buy a cert if you want one for a .onion. Let's encrypt still doesn't support it :(

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But...an onion address doesn't need a cert?

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 22 hours ago

Some apps refuse to work if you dont have TLS, so it depends what you're running

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] laxe@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Huge impact on a tiny budget - that’s extremely impressive. The world could be so much better without rent seeking parasites.

[–] zerozaku@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Can anyone fill me on this? Why is it so significant?

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

HTTPS certs used to be very expensive and technically complicated, making it out of reach for most smaller orgs. Let's Encrypt brought easy mass adoption and changed encryption availability on the web for everyone.

[–] dan@upvote.au 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They also made it a open protocol (the ACME protocol), so now there's a bunch of certificate providers that implement the same protocol and thus can work with the same client apps (Certbot, acme.sh, etc). I know Sectigo and GoDaddy support ACME at least. So even if you don't use Let's Encrypt, you can still benefit from their work.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is the free, easy way to get an SSL cert (plus automated renewals). Without it, maybe HTTPS wouldn't have been so omnipresent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (12 children)

Let's Encrypt is amazing, but are there any equally trustworthy alternatives people could switch to if something bad happens to it?

[–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

ZeroSSL, plus a few paid companies support ACME (I know Sectigo and GoDaddy do). Sure, the latter are paid services, but in theory you can switch to them and use the exact same setup you're currently using with Let's Encrypt, just with some config changes.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They came up with the ACME protocol, so presumably somebody could. The real barrier to entry is the cost of getting into that certificate chain of trust. I have no idea why it's so difficult and expensive.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well, it's difficult, as it should be, because if you control a certificate in the active chain of trust of browsers, you can hack pretty much anything you want.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›