this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
508 points (95.4% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3741 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Scott Pelley recapped the Cabinet picks of President-elect Donald Trump in the “60 Minutes” opening Sunday, enraging MAGA supporters despite the segment’s recitation of facts. (Watch the video below.)

The summary “is exactly why no one respects the legacy media anymore,” one person complained on X, formerly Twitter.

“Pure Democratic propaganda,” griped another.

Pelley, a correspondent, began by noting “some nominees appear to have no compelling qualifications other than loyalty to Trump.”

He pointed out defense secretary nominee Pete Hegseth’s lack of government experience and recent gig as a Fox News morning host; the investigation into attorney general nominee Matt Gaetz’s alleged sex with a minor; and the vaccine skepticism of health and human services nominee Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

“It’s up to the new Republican majority in the Senate to decide whether these nominees are equipped to represent the American people,” Pelley concluded.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] maniajack@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This article is fucked up. No one (likely) here saw the 60 minutes opening, we're all reading about a huffpost article about the response from a bunch of people on Twitter, those might not even be Americans, they might have an IQ of 50, why are they driving the conversation? We're not taking the time to watch the 60 minutes and we're letting huffpost make money off of outrage culture. The content of the 60 minutes is the story and crucially important not the idiots/bots/propaganda responding to it. The shittiest type of journalism is based off Twitter replies and the best journalism is what 60 min is doing

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 3 days ago

Twitter slams 60 minutes over factual statements!

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Better get used to it, what someone says doesn't matter anymore, what you can make people believe was said, and how outraged that will make them, is all that matters.

I'm not saying that I'm endorsing it, but I do think my statement is pretty precise... But also it tries to exploit the phenomenon, to outrage you dear reader into taking action.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If facts make those Nazi flowers wither, shower them with facts.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Pretty sure they are actually completely immune to facts.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 239 points 4 days ago (12 children)

Why are we accepting reporting on tweets as a journalism?

Yeah MAGA reacted to the 60 minutes, but so what? One can find similar reactions on any topic, there's nothing new that we learn by reading this. It just manufacturers outrage on the other side.

[–] Breadhax0r@lemmy.world 44 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Twitter is the official mouthpiece of the trump administration though.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Seems to be the mouthpiece of anyone trying to argue anything nowadays. you can always find a tweet supporting any argument you wanna make.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 days ago

That's the whole point: Bread & Circuses, Part Duh©

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago

For now. It will be state sponsored media shortly

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This could very well be one of the first times a large swath of cable tv viewers and MAGA heard about Gaetz allegations of giving hardcore drugs to child prostitutes, so seeing their reaponse is interesting.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

MAGA people avoid all mainstream media except 60 minutes on CBS?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

A large number of Americans prefer to get news from Cable TV. Especially the elderly and poor.

The biggest cable news network by a huge margin is Fox News with more than double the second place, MSNBC, views.

CBS isn't on Cable, it is a Broadcast TV network but it is among the highest rated broadcast channels, even higher than Fox News, due to CBS also covering sports.

So while CBS is less popular as a news network, 60 Minutes is the most popular News Program in the USA.

In 2013 Pew Research said "About one- quarter of American adults, (24%) watch only Fox News, 23% watch only CNN and 15% watch only MSNBC."

And here's some additional graphs for further enrichment of your contextual info

You're welcome for the free sociology lesson.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Right. Cherry-picking kool-aid enthusiasts spreading their knee-jerk reaction on social media isn't journalism. These people are likely not valid representatives of public MAGA opinion, to say the least.

The anti-mainstream media comment in particular turns this whole post so many levels of irony that it's actually challenging to unpack it in a succinct way.

[–] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago

They barely reacted. These maga types aren’t going to watch some video critical of their beliefs which are more akin to religious than political these days

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Why are we accepting reporting on tweets as a journalism?

Are we? It's on huffpost.com. Since when is that journalism?

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Lol their feelings don't care about your facts

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Facts and evidence have a left wing bias don'cha know /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 113 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It would be nice if journalism was this honest the last 8 FUCKING YEARS.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 29 points 3 days ago

It's convenient now. The news media isn't so much biased in terms of left vs right, but rather they're biased in favor of an explosive narrative. Trump provides so many explosive narratives just by his mere existence.

So no, they're not suddenly finding honesty. They're starting to feast on the buffet they cooked for themselves.

[–] NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org 132 points 4 days ago (7 children)

4 years of crybaby MAGA people who don't know what's what and thinks everything is against them. Which is partially true.

4 years of this, people.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 41 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

4 more years of this. donvict's bastardization of the slogan dates back to december 2011.

the far right whining about the 'liberal' media goes back a lot earlier than that

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Thanks, Merrick Garland. Way to let a guy credibly accused of like 6 different Federal crimes (including a whole ass coup) just walk by slow walking investigations because you didn't want to look political.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

4 years... at least.

[–] sarcasticsunrise@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Only 4? God I wish I had your optimism

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago

4 years of "you'll never believe what we've found on twitter" journalism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 75 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Did any of these MAGAs tweet a list of qualifications other than loyalty to Trump? Because that's how facts would work.

Unless the facts don't support another conclusion? How weird.

[–] ObstreperousCanadian@lemmy.ca 46 points 3 days ago

Their feelings don't care about facts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Trump will adjourn the Senate and the House and get to appoint without confirmation.

The Constitution says the president can adjourn Congress only “in case of disagreement” between the House and the Senate on when the chambers should recess.

That is how Trump is going to do it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recess_appointment

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago

This is that "liberal news media" that MAGAs keep yammering on about. The one that's owned by six corporations.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wake me up when they actually melt.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

The glaciers are going to melt loooooooooong before the MAGA cult will.

[–] PedroMaldonado@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

When you're an asshole, being called out seems like persecution

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Well, looks like it is already starting. I fully expected the donvict fans to get even angrier if he won. Just like last time.

I think part of it is that they are now also having conversations in their lives where normal Americans are just fucking done with them. Just because they are enthusiastic about donvict, and gleefully voted for him over the objections of those around them, doesn't mean they are going to just roll with it, and still be friends, lovers, relatives, because "it's just politics". Some people are just getting cut off:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/man-left-speechless-as-wife-files-for-divorce-after-he-voted-for-donald-trump/ar-AA1tX4kp

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

So?

I mean . . . this is nothing. This is just the kind of article you can expect for at least 3.7 years. You wanna dig your teeth into a second turd circus administration, feel free. It won't change a motherfucking thing.

The corporate medai has failed so spectacularly they're just staring up their own asshole at this point asking each other what they think.

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Meh...no it didn't. Maga people don't watch 60 minutes. A bunch of X bots reposted a bunch of bot links.

load more comments
view more: next ›