this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
255 points (72.3% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2288 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Kamala Harris’s political skills have transformed a potentially disastrous 2024 presidential election into a competitive race.

Despite initial skepticism and a challenging campaign, Harris has improved her public image and closed the gap with Trump on key issues. Since Biden stepped aside in July and endorsed her, she has shifted from an unpopular vice president to a viable candidate, even matching Trump in polls on economic issues.

Her leadership has given Democrats a chance to prevent a Trump landslide and halt the rise of American authoritarianism.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Here’s a list of progressive policies both foreign and domestic that supermajorities of both democrats and republicans support.

What’s that? You’d rather support genocide and brag about being endorsed by Dick Cheney?

You do you, I guess……. You’ll still get your weird blue maga votes i suppose.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 16 points 2 weeks ago

The fact that you thought I would vote for a WOMAN over a Rapist Felon who Promised to create HUGE Financial Hardships while killing my Daughter is LAUGHABLE!

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

That article has not aged well.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago

The coping has already begun.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

It is a much better situation than we were in just a few short months ago, so we've got that going for us, BUT we're living in the age of huge organizations not being able to stick the landing and epic faceplants that are screwing up countries/empires virtually overnight, so... yeah.

[–] StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago

Wow! What a great campaign /s

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I wouldn’t say that at all. It’s a testament to how terrible a candidate Trump is.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

LMAO. Cope harder. The fact that this race was close at all just shows how much of a joke they are.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

Wtf? So definitely nothing to do with the fact that her opponent is a rapist felon?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I’ve seen some people argue that had Biden stayed in, we would be seeing the same numbers. Not sure if I agree with that. But it’s an interesting thought.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

it aint over til the black lady sings.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›