this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Privacy

31614 readers
541 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I use ProtonVPN for everything, and I've started noticing more and more sites simply blocking me if I try to connect to them through ProtonVPN. As much as it sucks, I've more or less become acclimated to having to deal with an increased number of captchas while using a VPN; but I'm pretty angry about being blocked outright. There are at least two broad blocking tactics. First, some sites will say that my network traffic looks suspicious and/or that they simply block traffic from certain IP addresses. But second, and far more maddeningly, some sites tell me that my username and password combo are incorrect when I'm using a VPN. But I know this to be a blatant lie because (1) I use a password manager that auto-fills login forms with credentials that match the domain name, and (2) such sites accept my credentials when I visit them without the VPN connection.

What the hell can we do about this shit? Do I have to run my own VPN to avoid sharing an IP address with other people and thus getting blocked? I really don't want to do that because I have neither the time nor expertise, and I like that connecting through a VPN provider makes my IP address much less significant. I'm aware that this is connected to the broader conversation about WEI and other methods for determining whether requests are legitimate or not, and I'm sure that businesses of all sizes are reeling from massive increases in bot and AI activity. But solutions that end up punishing legitimate users are not good or valid solutions.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kungen@feddit.nu 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's an inherent problem with shared connections.

The thing with sites telling you that your login is incorrect is also sometimes intentional, so people trying to brute-force logins won't realize they're getting blocked or just that their attempt was incorrect.

And yes, the only possibility is to try a different server that hasn't been abused, or run your own.

[–] library_napper@monyet.cc -1 points 11 months ago

This is what 2FA is for

[–] alt@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't know if it even works, but have you considered relying on their Stealth protocol? While its absence on Linux ~(and~ ~Windows)~ means that you might not even be able to make use of it in the first place, I'm still interested to know if it makes any difference.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] library_napper@monyet.cc -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We need laws that prevent companies from discriminating by how you look. Websites should only be able to deny customers based on how they act. A simple innocent GET from a user with a VPN IP should not be legally permissible reason to deny them.

[–] pragmakist@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That thing where they claim the username/password combo is wrong?

That sounds like a really good idea if the site thinks the reason they're a lot of different lock-on attemps from that one ip is because its a hacker with a list of stolen credentials.

Basically just tell them their list is fake and "go away and stop bothering our customers, please."

[–] library_napper@monyet.cc -1 points 11 months ago

Thats not a good idea because these systems false-positive all the time.

If my first login attempt has the correct username, correct password, and correct totp token, then I should always be let in. That's literally how auth works.