this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
38 points (89.6% liked)

World News

490 readers
15 users here now

News from outside of Australia

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Israel’s parliament has voted to ban the United Nations relief and works agency (Unrwa) from the country within 90 days, in defiance of US and other international pressure to maintain the largest provider of humanitarian assistance to the country’s Palestinian population.

In a 92-10 vote late on Monday, the Knesset banned the agency, which operates in Israel according to a 1967 treaty, from conducting “any activity” or providing any service inside Israel, including the areas of annexed east Jerusalem, Gaza and the West Bank.

Israeli lawmakers also voted to declare Unrwa a terror group, effectively banning any direct interaction between the UN agency and the Israeli state.

Taken together, the legislation – which will not come into effect immediately – is expected to lead to the closure of Unrwa’s east Jerusalem headquarters and would effectively block the delivery of humanitarian aid into Gaza via Rafah. The severing of diplomatic relations would preclude Israel from issuing entry and work permits to foreign Unrwa staff and prevent coordination with the Israeli military to permit aid shipments.

More than 1.9 million Palestinians are displaced and the Gaza strip faces widespread shortages of food, water and medicine.

There's also an 'Explainer' article for more background: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/28/what-is-unrwa-and-why-has-israels-parliament-voted-to-ban-it

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

What the absolute fuck are they thinking?

Did someone spike the Israel water supply with stupid pills or something?

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Expelling all Palestinians from any part of Palestine has always been the plan though. No spiking of water necessary.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah, but trying to cut ties with un humanitarian services is going to erode their already shaky position with purported allies. No treaty or alliance can survive everything. At some point, the risk/reward analysis is going to turn against them, and even their allies that rely on them to be a force projection in the region are going to start abandoning them.

Are they thinking that if they keep this shit up that they'll get attacked full on and their tenuous alliances are going to jump into a world war for them?

It's such shitty long term thinking. Yeah, maybe they take Palestine fully before they lose backing, but what would they be left with? It wouldn't gain them anything worth having long term, and could cost them so much if it goes wrong.

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I believe their thinking is - they are tired of dealing with the escalation they provoked and aren't going to get another chance to fully genocide the Palestinians if they don't strike now. They have nukes and once they can settle the rest of the occupied territory it'll be a fait accompli - they can de-escalate and re-establish international diplomacy at that point.

I don't think it'll work out that way.

[–] guismo@aussie.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

is going to erode their already shaky position with purported allies.

As if... their history is full of stuff worse than this and nothing ever happened to them. Whatever chain they have in the ones they command is unbreakable. I think anything sort of nuking Palestine wouldn't affect them.

They can literally bomb their allies if they don't do what they want with no consequences. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The Israel far right is trying to outdo one another for who is most militant.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well, they're not purging Palestinians from Palestine so that they come to Israel, if that's what you're thinking.

[–] JRepin@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 weeks ago

It’s way past time that UN bans Israel from their institutions and puts heavy sanctions on them for their genocide and other crimes against humanity.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The United Nations Relief Agency, a terrorist organisation?? Who believes this shit.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 9 points 3 weeks ago

Nobody believes it. It's entirely an effort to provide just enough legal cover for their genocide.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone -5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

i mean germany found multiple members of unra participating in the oct 7 genocide attempt on israel so yeah? if unra has been infiltrated by hamas members why wouldn’t they?

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

you mean after

Eventually, a UN investigation found that nine UNRWA staff members may have been involved in the attack on Israel and terminated them

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago

Correct, after that the EU, Germany, Canada, Sweden, Australia, etc. determined that UNRWA was not a terrorist organisation, and resumed their funding.

[–] Seagoon_@aussie.zone 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There was live streaming by UNRWA employees , LIVE STREAMING

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago

I'm assuming you mean live streaming of the attacks on 7 October? Do you have a source for this? I can't even find anyone claiming this.

As far as I'm aware, the nature of the evidence against UNRWA staff (if there was any) was never made public. If there was live streaming, I think the Israeli government would never stop talking about it.

In any case, there were accusations against 12 UNRWA staff. UNRWA employed 13,000 people within the Gaza Strip, so even if those unproven accusations were true, it would hardly be indicative of UNRWA being a 'terrorist organisation'.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz -3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Drag doesn't believe the German government on anything. Especially not issues of genocide. They don't have a good record.

[–] grff@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe try commenting somewhere else if you have nothing useful or constructive to say. You don't believe the german government on anything because of... WWII? I just woke up and am taking a shit but I'm sure this is the dumbest thing I'll have read today

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, not WWII. The Holocaust. Also Germany's record of uncritical support for genocide in the middle east.

[–] Seagoon_@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

LIAR.

Germany accepted millions of refugees from Syria to save them from genocide by Putin and Assad.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone -4 points 3 weeks ago

How convenient for you

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Soooo are we still watching Palestinians die doing nothing? Yeah? Is that how the world works? Do we maybe send a formal letter that it's not very nice? Not even that?

[–] Seagoon_@aussie.zone -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sinwar had UNRWA ID on him when he was killed.

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

That's incorrect. The IDF claims that Sinwar had in his possession the passport of an UNRWA teacher. The passport expired in 2017, and its owner is a 40-year-old man who has been in Egypt since April.

source: https://www.france24.com/en/tv-shows/truth-or-fake/20241021-what-we-know-about-the-unrwa-id-allegedly-found-amidst-sinwar-s-belongings

I'm not sure how people imagine this to be some kind of smoking gun for UNRWA being a terrorist organisation. No government donors to UNRWA seem to have considered it worthy of taking any action.