this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45407 readers
758 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lenin himself wasn't the problem and the Statures for him are usually for being a Revolutionary and removing the Tzar.

Stalin was the actual problem.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lenin was a counterrevolutionary that brutally suppressed any dissent and directly placed Stalin (being well aware of what a person he was) in a position that would make his later takeover possible.

[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lenin did not place Stalin, stalin took over. Other than that, yes.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lenin placed Stalin as an enforcer to do the dirty stuff for him. It would be very naive to assume Lenin didn't know the risk involved of putting a former mob gangster in such a position.

[–] Noughmad@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

France never experienced communism?

Ackshully...

[–] neuracnu@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

The photo of the USA Lenin statue isn't accurate. It resides in the Fremont neighborhood in Seattle, where it frequently has its hands and body splashed with red paint to represent the blood on Lenin's hands.

Just do an image search for it or check it out on google maps streetview.

[–] Filthmontane@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're showing statues of Lenin in countries in which the Dictatorship of the Proletariat failed to cede power to the working class and establish a socialist economic structure.

When Lenin took power, Russia had nothing. It was in the middle of WW1, there were regular famines, almost everyone was illiterate, and it was in no condition to establish a socialist economic plan. So, Lenin created a temporary economic model called The Dictatorship of the Proletariat. This is a centrally planned economy designed to rapidly develop infrastructure and industry in a country that has none. Lenin was already ceding power to the worker's councils when he died. Stalin decided he liked The Dictatorship of the Proletariat and did not cede power back to the worker's councils.

Those countries never experienced Communism. They never even experienced socialism. They destroyed those statues because they hated The Dictatorship of the Proletariat. Living in a system designed for a short temporary economic boom for decades is no fun.

[–] CHINESEBOTTROLL@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

countries in which the Dictatorship of the Proletariat failed to cede power to the working class and establish a socialist economic structure

Oh, so like every single other place that tried to implement that deranged system? Thank you for this very important distinction.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about all these capitalist places that fell into fascism? What about the successful capitalist states that are currently falling into fascism?

[–] CHINESEBOTTROLL@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about them? The choices here are not "what we have now" vs "trust the people that want to try communism again"

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My point is about the flawed argument : "communism is bad because the attempts have failed". Well, there are more capitalist attempts that failed than communist ones, so the argument doesn't hold.

[–] CHINESEBOTTROLL@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My argument is not "look how many attempts have failed" but "look, of all of these many attempts, every single one has turned into a kafkaesque nightmare". At this point it is not even clear that "successful communism" is something that can exist in our world

On the other hand, while many (depending on your perspective you might even say most) capitalist systems fail, there are absolutely some that work ok. Of course nothing is perfect in the real world. But the life of say a danish person is not only materially well off, but also free and full of dignity, which was true of none of the experiments in communism

[–] bouh@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure many Chinese are well off, free and full of dignity.

It's also easier to be a successful country when you're not under ambargo just because you're not sold to capitalist companies. Did the US left even one communist country live normally?

But more importantly, how many successful capitalist countries, today, aren't going fascist at full speed?

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

None of the lower countries had communism.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Technically correct. They were under Stalins Marxism-Leninism, which was supposed to be a placeholder until true communism could be implemented.

But it's a bit disingenuous to split that hair in this thread. The irony being that the latter are all countries that got to experience the kind of gouvernemental structure that Lenin facilitated.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can argue if they had sunshine scenario communism all day, but they certainly was under the oppressive thumb of USSR.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago

I didn't say anything about communism being good or bad there, just that none of those countries ever lived under communism.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, countries run by fascists hate communism.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Russia seems fine with it though

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So are we discussing countries were fascists live in or run by fascists? Because Russia is 100% the latter

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

Russia is a partially neoliberal bourgeois democracy(aka dictatorship of the bourgeoisie) they do stuff like invade Ukraine/Iraq/Afghanistan while being distinct enough from fascism that it is more accurate to just call them neolibs

[–] GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago

Wtf I love capitalism now

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

Hmm, why do these fascist anti-communist regimes that the US propped up hate Lenin?