this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
853 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

58692 readers
4019 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Wayback Machine back in read-only mode after DDoS, may need further maintenance.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This absolutely made my morning.

Edit: Never mind, already knew about the Wayback machine. I thought it was the rest of the archive.

Still good news.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 102 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Maybe it’s time to federate the IA.

[–] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 day ago (6 children)

One of the rare use cases of a blockchain actually being useful. A federated internet archive that uses a blockchain to validate that the saved data has not been altered by a malicious actor trying to tamper with proofs

That would be really cool but horribly inefficient because of the sheer amount of storage required

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 92 points 1 day ago (1 children)

horribly inefficient

The core feature of all blockchain tech.

[–] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair that would not necessarily be because of the blockchain part, more because of the decentralized/federated nature of this theorical network

Sure, but the networking and consent-finding are defining features of a blockchain. Nobody calls a git repo a blockchain.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean you don’t need the blockchain for that. The same way that distro mirrors don’t need the blockchain. It can be federated, with each upload being verified through hashes that they are in fact the real upload. I would argue that something like blockchain would remove the authority from them, granting the position of a bad actor spinning up enough servers to be able to poison the blockchain just because they had the computing power, claiming authority

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Bro hear me out bro

We put the whole thing on a blockchain. BUT

  • entry order isn't super important

  • you don't need to validate the entire archive

So basically a blockchain, but for a bunch of files, not ordered. So instead of a native token, users can just trade bits of information as currency. 🙀

If it goes really well, we could even recruit one of the Bitcoin developers to help.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

lol I fucking hate this because idiots will read this and be like “oh shit is this the new blockchain”

Well done

[–] RedStrider@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Sounds like BitTorrent, too

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Yes, this is a great example of where ipfs would work (specifically for file hosting, not necessarily for the actual web interface), and also, no ipfs is not a blockchain, and it shouldn’t be. I thought we were past the whole “can this be a blockchain” thing, but here we are. Blockchain is cool tech. It’s also incredibly inefficient for anything beyond a transaction ledger, or in today’s case, money laundering and trying to avoid taxes and regulation.

[–] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The thing is sometimed articles must be removed from IA (copyright (I disagree with that one) or when information is leaked that could threaten lives), with a blockchain this would be impossible

[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

this would be impossible

Perfect.

I'd be interested in seeing real examples where lives are threatened. I find it unlikely that the internet archive would be the exclusive arbiter of so-called deadly information

[–] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

There was an actual example where a journalistic article about afghanistan accidentally leaked names of some sources and people who helped westerners in afghanistan, which did actually endanger those people’s lives.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You need a useless 51% of good nodes to assure that, making it even more wasteful.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know if that's a good idea.

How would you go about implementing the infrastructure for that?

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

That’s an excellent question. Unfortunately I do not have an answer. But I believe it’s worth discussing some means of redundancy for the IA; even if it’s as simple as rsync to other hosts.

[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 5 points 1 day ago

They’ve been using Filecoin

[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 day ago

It's worth noting that the saved pages are the only thing that are back for now. Their other services have not yet been brought back online.

[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A commenter on Ars suggested donating, so I did. You can too with this link! https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/internetarchive

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 15 points 1 day ago

I verified this is indeed the method listed on the Internet Archive website.

[–] llii@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

I need to do this again. I donated last year, but it's one of my favorite and one pretty important site.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

Such good news!

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I realize it's like the least important aspect of this, but yay! My podcast is back! I listen to Lawrence Manzo's Mahabharata podcast every night to go to sleep, and I haven't slept well since the attack

[–] ne0phyte@feddit.org 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you rely on it that much maybe its time to download it all and keep it.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I honestly don't know how I'd get it until it comes back. I can download through the podcast app, but until then, to my knowledge, it's completely lost anywhere other than archive.org Even the original blog it was posted to back in 2010 doesn't have the audiofiles anymore, just links to the archive.org

[–] vortexsurfer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It should be possible to download the audio files directly from archive.org, using a browser.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

Once it's back, I'll definitely do that. It's still not available as of yet.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This is why it breaks. It's not a streaming CDN. Do you torrent over tor as well?

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Maybe if you're rude to more people you can fix everything.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

I use a podcast app, and apparently it pulls from there. I never knew before it went down. But I tried a bunch of different apps over the course of this, and they all pull from that.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay, which one is missing?

[–] unreachable@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

follow the ~~money~~chemtrail

[–] small44@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Only the way back machine is restarted to me not archive.org