this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
524 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

10637 readers
2805 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 77 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] criitz@reddthat.com 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 36 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Technically you’re not wrong. Mainly because there’s no agreed upon technical definition of what does or doesn’t constitute a tree.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

the definition of tree is literally just something that looks like a tree: a woody trunk with branches.

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

TIL that trees are the same as vegetables and weeds, arbitrary cultural groupings. We should make an arbitrary cultural group name for arbitrary cultural grouped things!

So far the group is: -Trees -Vegetables -Weeds -Pets -Continents -The culinary use of fruit

[–] Szyler@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I think both of those have rigid scientific definitions.

[–] Szyler@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Oh yeah. I thought you meant how they are used culturally. Because we have many nok-berries with berry in their name.

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 5 points 5 days ago

I feel like sports could fit into that pretty well.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Most won't consider it a tree but who am I to judge

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Most are wrong then. If you can make toothpicks out of it, it's a tree.

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

You can make toothpicks out of anything if you're willing to find a hard bit in it that can be sharpened or whittled.

Holds up a chicken. Behold! A tree!

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

bones are trees? o_o

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 2 points 5 days ago

Nope, that's not how the definition of a tree works. Look at swednek's definition in the comments: it is a woody trunk with branches. There are many other plants you could make toothpicks out of (e.g. that are woody) that aren't trees. For example, shrubs and lianas.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

So... Everything is a tree? 🤔

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Because there is no such thing ad a tree. A tree is just a way some plants like to grow.

[–] Vatowine@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

My favorite slightly different perspective today

[–] ghterve@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Why would she be mad about her partner thinking about other women? Is she insecure?

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago

Every lawn would look like a forest if grass were as tall as bamboo. Every forest would look like grasslands if trees were as tall as grass.

[–] TastyWheat@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

She's got a point

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For me personally it's this damn neighborhood I came across once called Woodfield. Which one is it??! Woods or a field?! I lie awake at night, guys.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Schrodinger's landscape

[–] nathanjent@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

He can't see the forest for the grass.