this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
53 points (93.4% liked)

Games

16796 readers
1149 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Just?" That seems like a lot, considering.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Estimates have put the game's budget at upwards of $250 million, so they'd need to sell at least 5 times as many copies to even break even. Games (from traditional studios, anyway) are crazy expensive now.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's insane for how many bugs it has. What are they spending this money on? It's clearly not development time

[–] PunkiBas@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Marketing probably

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's such a boring game. I'm stupid for hoping it would be fun

[–] LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

No you're not. You're allowed to hope for something and be let down it's on them to do better especially since they can and have the resources to do so but choose not to.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago

Don't hope anything for unreleased games.

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’ve been waiting for the price to come down a bit, and because I’ve learned my lesson to always wait a while before buying any Star Wars game.

But I’ll definitely buy it eventually, just like I eventually buy every Star Wars game. Wonder if more people are learning the same lessons as me?

[–] arni@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks, I wasn’t subbed to that instance’s version of the community.

[–] Moriarty@startrek.website 12 points 1 month ago

It's not on steam, also if you're going to ask me to pay 90 dollars for a mediocre game you can kindly fuck off.

[–] lustyargonian@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's quite a lot honestly

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 7 points 1 month ago

at $70 a game, that's $70 million dollars in revenue!

But I think the rumor mill has the games budget around 250m dollars.

Their break even point is 5.5 million units sold. Maybe when they release on steam

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I just got it on sale ($15 off on Uplay) and I gotta say I'm rather confused why it isn't more popular. It's not perfect, and combat is a little simple, but it's exceptionally well written, the mini games are legit fun, and the world feels really fleshed out and authentic and the music is outstanding. The main theme sounds like a modern take on Williams it's crazy good.

Tbh I haven't even noticed the "AI" generated stuff it's no different than procedurally generated content if not even more well weaved in the game. I dunno it's just fun for me. Just change the settings to all hard and disable the assists and suggestions.

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You got it on sale so of course you'll be less critical about how unfinished it is.

[–] zecg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Disney's milking made the licence really unappealing and Ubisoft's open worlds were unappealing even back when they had some quality control and graphics had to look good. Now it's just smear this unplausible cutesy mammal sidekick with some temporal antialiasing and also no one on our team knows how to make enemies exhibit any behavior. Fucking die, Ubisoft. I told you in 2012. when you made uplay it would end like this.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago

If folks want to sell lots of copies, why do they keep making shit games? It's such an easy problem to identify.