this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

17937 readers
36 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I’m gonna start my own browser, with blackjack, and hookers

[–] natecox@programming.dev 0 points 4 months ago

Before you get really upset about this thread, you should read this other one: https://federate.social/@jik/112779924411100427

I’m not thrilled about this by any means, but what Firefox is doing is not what chrome is doing (which is what the op posted thread is claiming). Conflating them serves no one.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But it says "without sending information about you"

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] tyler@programming.dev 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't sound bad at all!

Yup, it's basically what I've been pushing for and what I hoped Brave would do when they launched. We're always going to have ads, and browsers are in a position to make those as privacy-friendly as possible. Give advertisers only as much as they need (total views and clicks, and related, aggregated data), not what they want (individual tracking, "engagement" metrics like mouse movements, etc).

I'll always hate ads, but I might be willing to disable my ad blocker if the ads respect my privacy and the content on the page is good.