this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
158 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
218 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 48 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Right-wingers as usual wanting to eradicate the past so that they can claim dumb shit like "there were no concentration camps". And yet they call themselves "conservatives". What a joke.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 26 points 1 month ago

Ain’t nothin’ less conservative than a Conservative

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 43 points 1 month ago (4 children)

the internet was awesome for like ... twenty years. thirty if you count the era where people mostly communicated through newsgroups and such. it feels like the enshittification was so sudden...

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's been going to shit since like, 2015? I think that's about when ad blockers became a necessity to just read any website on the internet. Maybe a few years before that.

  1. Maybe 2009~2009. Mobile devices lowering the bar for entry has been apocalyptic.
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s not an internet thing, or even a technology thing. This is an example of the general debasement of society wrought through half a century of rampant sociopathic neoliberal shitfuckery.

One place I’d like to see this start to be corrected, is treating what is currently understood to be intellectual property as the intrinsically abundant resource it is, instead of the artificially scarce, zero-sum concept it’s currently encrusted as.

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

Looking back now there were some signs but boy that escalated quickly

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 month ago

I guess the big question that lies under this whole debate is "can someone own our culture and rent it back to us", and "do works of art have meaning and value beyond monetary value"

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I doubt furries would approve of record label lawsuits.

as a furry, you're right but - why?

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

Glad they have all this excess to use against the people that gave it to them.

Glad the people that gave it to them gave it to them instead of helping out those who actually need it.

Great world.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago

Who Owns The Past

🫵 1984

[–] Eryn6844@beehaw.org 6 points 1 month ago

I hope they got a plan to move to a different country

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are major record labels furries?

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've seen a lot of furry hatred, but comparing them to record labels might be the worst.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

I wasn't comparing them to that. Making a joke about the 621 in the lawsuit amount. It's a furry-associated number.

[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i read the whole article and still have no idea what this has to do with furries.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

It's just a joke about the 621.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

621 is more or less the site they go to for seeing the illustrations of dog dicks that they're so fond of.