this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
264 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

76138 readers
3171 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 89 points 1 year ago

Is nintendo replacing their lawyers with ai soon too?

[–] potat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 78 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Isn't this the same broken AI that has been striking youtube videos about Minecraft clients? Why is every company suddenly using this?

Edit: Yes it is. I really don't know what to say anymore. Imagine applying youtube's broken copyright system to the entire internet, but even worse.

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because they can. There are no laws stopping them.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are provisions in the DMCA for filing false claims.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 1 year ago

It’s easy to file a DCMA claim.

It’s harder to challenge it, let alone go after those faking it.

[–] nfms@lemmy.ml 72 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Energy wasted to create an AI image to have more energy wasted to have an AI remove it. I'd say this is a win for AI

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

AI actually stands for Artificial Incredible harm being caused to the planet

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's more of a win for Nintendo really.

[–] nfms@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I forgot the "/s" at the end 😀.
But on that point, Nintendo's actions are making it more difficult for me to play on my switch.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Flood the net with photos and make their AI work overtime costing them lots

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Flood it with AI copies of official Mario content. Train the copyright software to associate the context of the official art to get the official art taken down.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 47 points 1 year ago

The Mario detection tool seems to be catching fan art in the crossfire, too.

That's the actual headline.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why does the title specify that the tool is taking down “AI-generated” pictures if the article focuses on how it’s taking down fan art indiscriminately?

[–] dan@upvote.au 23 points 1 year ago

Because anything AI-related gets more clicks.

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Two can play that game. I bet it is possible to create an AI tool that generates and posts Mario pictures faster than they can take them down. Why you'd want to do that I don't know.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago

Spite. That's why.

[–] Shadywack@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just want to see Nintendo go after all the Rule34 stuff. It might be the one thing that could exhaust their resources.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I thought AI generated pictures were automatically public domain and unable to be copyrighted?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 18 points 1 year ago

You've got that the other way around. You can't copyright AI generated pictures, but pictures created by AI can still be taken down as violations of copyright law.

[–] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

I don't think that's how it works. If it exactly looks like something protected by laws like copyright or whatever your country uses, I highly doubt that any court would say that it's fine just because it was created by AI.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Do you have the time and money to fite that in court against Nintendo?

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago

Just let the man have a pint! He’s certainly earned it.

[–] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

It was only a matter of time, especially for Nintendo.