this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
264 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59613 readers
2826 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 89 points 2 months ago

Is nintendo replacing their lawyers with ai soon too?

[–] potat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 78 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Isn't this the same broken AI that has been striking youtube videos about Minecraft clients? Why is every company suddenly using this?

Edit: Yes it is. I really don't know what to say anymore. Imagine applying youtube's broken copyright system to the entire internet, but even worse.

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because they can. There are no laws stopping them.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are provisions in the DMCA for filing false claims.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 2 months ago

It’s easy to file a DCMA claim.

It’s harder to challenge it, let alone go after those faking it.

[–] nfms@lemmy.ml 72 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Energy wasted to create an AI image to have more energy wasted to have an AI remove it. I'd say this is a win for AI

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago

AI actually stands for Artificial Incredible harm being caused to the planet

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's more of a win for Nintendo really.

[–] nfms@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

I forgot the "/s" at the end 😀.
But on that point, Nintendo's actions are making it more difficult for me to play on my switch.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 50 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Flood the net with photos and make their AI work overtime costing them lots

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

Flood it with AI copies of official Mario content. Train the copyright software to associate the context of the official art to get the official art taken down.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 47 points 2 months ago

The Mario detection tool seems to be catching fan art in the crossfire, too.

That's the actual headline.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why does the title specify that the tool is taking down “AI-generated” pictures if the article focuses on how it’s taking down fan art indiscriminately?

[–] dan@upvote.au 23 points 2 months ago

Because anything AI-related gets more clicks.

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Two can play that game. I bet it is possible to create an AI tool that generates and posts Mario pictures faster than they can take them down. Why you'd want to do that I don't know.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 12 points 2 months ago

Why you want to waste Nintendos lawyers time?

Because it’s a noble goal. Nintendo are massive shit cunts to everyone else.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago

Spite. That's why.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 27 points 2 months ago

Every time I think shitendo can't get any worse, they prove me wrong. I hate that company so much. They are like a rich brat kid with a toy he is telling everyone not to touch. Fuck off already

[–] Shadywack@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I just want to see Nintendo go after all the Rule34 stuff. It might be the one thing that could exhaust their resources.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I thought AI generated pictures were automatically public domain and unable to be copyrighted?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 18 points 2 months ago

You've got that the other way around. You can't copyright AI generated pictures, but pictures created by AI can still be taken down as violations of copyright law.

[–] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

I don't think that's how it works. If it exactly looks like something protected by laws like copyright or whatever your country uses, I highly doubt that any court would say that it's fine just because it was created by AI.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Do you have the time and money to fite that in court against Nintendo?

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

It was only a matter of time, especially for Nintendo.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago

Just let the man have a pint! He’s certainly earned it.