this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
125 points (95.6% liked)

science

14546 readers
248 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 32 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

as far as crash-landings go, this was freakin beautiful

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It was positioned well for the failure but I'm not a fan of the dramatic circling drone shot. It gives you no concept of size, scale or altitude of ... anything. The static camera positions we get from spacex are way better.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Lol I cracked up when it happened. The fuckin title had me expecting hiroshima/nagasaki 2.0 then it just flops down like a toddler learning to go from standing position to sitting on floor position😂

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 weeks ago

that was some impressive drone footage. beautiful

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Pretty impressive engineering regardless. I suspect they’ll have it figured out in no time. Reusable rockets owned by China will be a huge blow for American aerospace.

[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

But, competition also spurs growth and innovation. With China going all in on the game, too, we may see more US politically motivated investment to stay ahead in the game vs our global enemies.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 6 points 3 weeks ago

No the US is falling in on it's own kleptocracy as we continue to not tax the wealthy and let the private sector flounder under Musk and I'll

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

we may see more US politically motivated investment to stay ahead in the game vs our global enemies.

Yes Boeing et al should be given more taxpayer money to waste like

Ain't the free market grand

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The drone works was really nice. Pretty cool video and always nice to see companies publishing their failures aswell.

[–] pageflight@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, looked like someone flying acro, not an auto pilot. That would be a fun flight.

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The engine cut was so sudden. I was honestly expecting a more dramatic failure, but still awesome to see reusable rockets steadily becoming the norm.

[–] walter_wiggles@lemmy.nz 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

More dramatic?! There was music and everything...

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago

Dramatic like a fireball rising up from the crash, not the drama created by the camera and music.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Might have been an uncommanded/incorrectly-commanded engine shutdown, or some sort of sensor issue or control system integration bug

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Article says incorrect altitude measurement caused premature engine cutoff.

Reading the article before posting?

Believe it or not, straight to jail.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

People tend to prefer context in science communities.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, still. Title says video.

[–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

God dammit Jeb. I told you we needed moar boosters

Scott, stop abusing Jeb. He's people too.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That photo looks like CGI.

[–] Joker@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

This is expensive cgi, it screams it. Not quite sure why they made it but someone needs to be convinced of something for sure.

(Just compare it to any footage of SpaceX landings, this video is far to clean, the sky alone is "perfect")

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

the sky alone is "perfect"

Which the sky of a desert pretty often is?

[–] Thadrax@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Overly dramatic I'd say. I would have liked less movement of the drone to be able to better judge the movement of the rocket.

[–] Balthazar@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

They did a lot of hovering. Are they not doing a hover-slam because it's much lighter than Falcon-9?