this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
274 points (96.3% liked)

News

23361 readers
3173 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is nice and all, but I don't know that it means a whole lot. There are few stakes for the people coming out to endorse Harris now. They don't work in govt roles, hold position in a political organization or an elected office.

The rank and file GOP (who are running for reelection now or in 2-4 years) are still sticking to the party line and the approved narrative. When they start flipping then it will be real news.

[–] USSMojave@startrek.website 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This isn't to sway them, it's to sway their constituents

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Which is stale 90s thinking.

You might be able to convince Patriot Act cheerleaders with an image to whitewash to make a public statement, but you're not going to convince any voter from the far right echo chamber to vote for any candidate from what they've been told is the party of pure evil their entire life.

The only people who haven't decided whether or not to vote for the Mango Mussolini are accelerationist idiots who can't be reached, people who won't be voting, and combinations of both.

To the LEFT of the Dem leadership, on the other hand, is by far the largest group of politically disenfranchised but persuadable voters.

They're trying to decide if Harris is too right wing to be worth overcoming the many obstacles to voting inherent to a system in the control of one party that despises them and another that takes them for granted.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I wish the Harris campaign would stop advertising how many awful people approve of her more than of a literal fascist. It's not the flex they seem to think it is.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Be that as it may, it still says that the people who have had personal dealings with Trump won't support him.

It gives non-MAGA Republicans "permission" to also not vote for Trump.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It gives non-MAGA Republicans "permission" to also not vote for Trump

It really doesn't, no. A few paleoconservative war criminals taking a personal dislike to him won't sway any member of the cult away.

Blindly following Trump as if he's the second coming of Jesus is more important to them than any other allegiance. The moment anyone speaks out against him, they become the enemy.

The only people who approve of there turncoat criminals are people who are already going to vote for Harris no matter what.

The only people whose opinion could be changed by a bunch of war criminals endorsing her are those that are already on the fence about her because of her insistence on arming Israel. Adding awful people who ALSO support that Apartheid regime blindly doesn't help with that.

Disclaimer in case it's necessary: while the reluctant people on the left have good reason to be wary of her, I'm 100% in favor of voting for her and then holding her accountable for her actions and lack of same, rather than let Trump become the last president of the US.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It gives non-MAGA Republicans "permission" to also not vote for Trump

It really doesn't, no. A few paleoconservative war criminals taking a personal dislike to him won't sway any member of the cult away.

Did you not read the comment you replied to? They explicitly said "Non-MAGA", which would be people outside of the MAGA cult, lol

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Oops, missed the oxymoron. There's no such thing as a non-maga Republican. Hasn't been for years.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I believe they call themselves "centrists" these days, haha

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We prefer “conservatives.” Government to handle social issues capitalism doesn’t account for, and while they may chafe, regulation that protects the common good. No abortion or gun nonsense. I voted red in the 90’s, and now the same candidate comes in blue.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

In Canada, our conservatives are more like "Let's see what we can privatize. Highways, healthcare, utilities...cut funding for schools and other things, but write cheques to the population every once in a while so they'll like us".

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

First rule of rational politics: never let demagogues self-define their position on any political axis 😉

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Right?? Like... these assholes were whole-hog into the GOP... they have a track record of terrible choices.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter, the Democrats are killing the Republican party by absorbing its "moderates" and becoming the new right-wing.

They don't need lefties anymore.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

the Democrats are killing the Republican party by absorbing its "moderates" and becoming the new right-wing.

That happened in 2010 at the latest. There's children in middle school that weren't born before the moderate conservatives joined the Dems

The Dems are a party constantly avoiding being TOO successful compared to increasingly obvious villains and idiots by chasing the sliver of people between the most conservative Democrats and the least conservative Republicans.

The only ones killing the Republican party are Republicans themselves. The Dem leadership keeps bending over backwards to help them.

They don't need lefties anymore.

That's what Hillary thought in 2016