Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has firmly stated that Ukraine should be allowed to conduct long-range strikes inside Russian territory, despite threats from Moscow.

This stance comes in the wake of Ukrainian forces occupying parts of Russian territory for the first time since World War II, and Ukrainian officialls asking Western partners to remove restrictions on the use of Western long-range weapons so that Ukraine can degrade Russia’s logistics and airfields in the rear and bring the war to an end faster.

“Canada fully supports Ukraine using long-range weaponry to prevent and interdict Russia’s continued ability to degrade Ukrainian civilians and infrastructure, and mostly to kill innocent civilians in their unjust war,” Trudeau declared at a news conference in Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec.

MBFC

all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Too bad we don't really have much to give them.

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's good to say this part out loud so others can simply join in with his statement.

It may even be an orchestrated diplomatic act where one western nation starts the choir that's not that deeply involved with the hardware so they don't have any connections to the military complex. Man give them more credibility.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Absolutely! I'm happy he has voiced it.

[–] Questy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The US are using their influence to prevent it. France and the UK had already given permission for SCALP-EG/Stormshadow to be used. According to articles quoting a state department source, the US told Ukraine they could compromise aid if they used another nations weapons, regardless of permission. That article pointed out that the US policy doesn't allow for a defeat of Russia that would make a "reset of relations" difficult. This slow political pressure is needed to more publicly isolate the American position and force concessions.

Unfortunately I can't find the article again, I believe it was in Forbes. It was mentioned in a Military & History update on Ukraine.

[–] duckduckohno@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

US is probably not going to allow this before the election. Of course if Trump wins, there won't be anything like this unfortunately after the election also. Let's hope Dems stay in power.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Buy some atacms and send them.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I'd be happy if my tax dollars went towards that, yeah. Would be nice to tax enterprises and the ultra wealthy too, to send more ATACMs