this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
273 points (80.7% liked)

linuxmemes

20986 readers
1303 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 95 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I was going to ask what to do if i use windows, but then i realize this is Lemmy and that you need a Linux computer to make an account

    [–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Well it is also in linux memes

    [–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

    Technically correct because you can’t make an account without the server.

    [–] elidoz@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    I have no way to confirm or deny this, it may as well be true for all I know

    (my first comment on lemmy! yay!)

    [–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

    (my first comment on lemmy! yay!)

    Welcome!

    [–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

    And they use arch btw

    [–] EherNicht@feddit.org 76 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Thank you. My entire OS was so bloated now I have so much performance to spear.

    [–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago

    I'll bet your boot process is a lot shorter too.

    [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    There’s even performance to sword and shield.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] ooterness@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

    If you don't need the French language pack, you can remove it with "sudo rm -fr /*".

    [–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    It's asking for a password. What do I type? Sorry if this is a stupid question, I'm new to this Linux stuff.

    [–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)
    [–] AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

    why is the password ******* lol

    [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

    A fine purveyor of internet memeology, you are.

    [–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)
    > sudo rm -rf /*
    Remove-Item: A parameter cannot be found that matches parameter name 'rf'.
    

    later unixtards

    [–] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Does powershell have sudo? What does that do on windows, show a uac prompt or something?

    [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    It does now, since February this year. And yes it does show an auc prompt.

    [–] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Heh, inferior system keeps copying.

    [–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

    Microsoft realized they were losing basically the entire software development market to Linux so they started adding features like a pretty alright terminal emulator and a shell that almost looks POSIXcompliant if you squint (and don't pass any flags to its built in commands) and trying ineffectually to hide the fact that they were basically on their knees saying BLEASE COME BACK WE NEED YOU

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] mlg@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

    No that only reduces disk space which only really mattered for hard drives.

    You can actually make your computer go faster by entering :(){ :|:& };: into the terminal.

    It'll tell Linux to max out the CPU performance.

    [–] crimsoncobalt@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Does this really work? Wouldn't rm remove itself in /bin early in the process?

    [–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    I think it would continue even after it's own deletion as the binary is already loaded into memory, so process is not dependent on the file system. Still doubt that it'll complete successfully. Most likely the system crashes in the middle.

    [–] kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    I thought - - no-preserve root also needed to be added as an argument for self destruct to completely work.

    [–] elvith@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Yes, though you could also do rm -rf /* afaik to not need --no-preserve-root

    Edit: I just realized that the * is already in the meme. So this should already work as is. Alternatively you could always use the good old way of "act now and remove all French roots of your system: rm -fr / --no-preserve-root"

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

    as the binary is already loaded into memory

    That’s not the reason why it continues. It’s because there’s still a file descriptor open to rm.

    [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    In Unix/Linux, a removed file only disappears when the last file descriptor to it is gone. As long as the file /usr/bin/rm is still opened by a process (and it is, because it is running) it will not actually be deleted from disk from the perspective of that process.

    This also why removing a log file that's actively being written to doesn't clear up filesystem space, and why it's more effective to truncate it instead. ( e.g. Run > /var/log/myhugeactivelogfile.log instead of rm /var/log/myhugeactivelogfile.log), or why Linux can upgrade a package that's currently running and the running process will just keep chugging along as the old version, until restarted.

    Sometimes you can even use this to recover an accidentally deleted file, if it's still held open in a process. You can go to /proc/$PID/fd, where $PID is the process ID of the process holding the file open, and find all the file descriptors it has in use, and then copy the lost content from there.

    [–] Arcity@feddit.nl 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    rm doesn't remove memory in RAM

    [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    That’s not the reason why it continues. It’s because there’s still a file descriptor open to rm.

    [–] Johanno@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Since you forgot to add - - preserve-root It won't go too far. But at some point the system wants to load a file that is deleted and the kernel will panic. System crash. Delete incomplete. But rest assured, the important stuff is gone.

    [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Since you forgot to add - - preserve-root It won’t go too far

    Go on then ... try it.

    Or don't because you will erase your system. (Hint: it's in the asterisk)

    [–] Johanno@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Or was it non preserve. I never tried it though. I guess a vm should be fine to test it. On the other hand I don't care enough.

    [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    The flag is called --no-preserve-root, but the flag wouldn't do anything here because you're not deleting root (/), you're deleting all non-hidden files and directories under root (/*), and rm will just let you do it.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] NiPfi@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

    Everything is bloat mfs be like:

    [–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    You wouldn't download /boot, would you?

    [–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Basically

    Obscure

    Optimal

    Trojan

    Remove it now

    [–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Never create a file named "-rf *" unless you really plan on keeping it.

    [–] dwt@feddit.org 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
    rm ./—rf\ \*
    

    Am I missing something?

    [–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

    I'm not sure that you belong in this thread :)

    [–] one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    I'm not going to try it but... rm "./-rf *" would do the same? rm "./-rf \*" maybe?

    [–] dwt@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Couldn’t get single quotes to type on my phone, but best to always use them for problems like that, to completely get rid of shell interference.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
    [–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

    if you use fish you can tab-cycle tour way to the file

    [–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    I've been using Linux as my main driver for a couple of years now but I didn't know the list of reserved file name characters is so short.

    I didn't believe '*' is allowed. That alone is so error-prone, it's insane. Backslash is allowed too - how do you escape that? Sometimes I think they giggled while writing the specs.

    [–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

    Backslash is allowed too - how do you escape that?

    It's backslashes all the way down

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] pewpew@feddit.it 9 points 1 month ago

    Tecnically true

    [–] dunz@feddit.nu 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

    Joke's on you, I never figured out how to leave vim!

    load more comments
    view more: next ›