this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
1025 points (96.6% liked)

Memes

45745 readers
1665 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Trees don't generate large profits this quarter, obviously.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

From the pictures, the tank's only a couple meters from a tree itself. "supplement" would be a better word than "alternative" in the headline

[–] ItCantBeThatEasy@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

They aren’t liquid enough.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 9 points 11 months ago

This doesn't have a root system to worry about so it needs less underground space. Don't get me wrong I love me a good tree, but in places where there isn't enough land for roots to spread this could be useful. Lots of side walk trees die due to not enough space for the roots

[–] constantokra@lemmy.one 9 points 11 months ago

Local ordinances specify minimum space requirements for trees, which may mean that they're not allowed to be put in certain places. Also, they can cause pedestrian safety issues, as well as Ada compliance problems in confined spaces. This is an easy way to get something green in a place where you would otherwise not see a tree because of a lot of beaurocratic bullshit.

Obviously, you can argue that all that needs to be changed. And you'd be right. And in many places it's moving that way. But then you also wouldn't get anything done for quite some time. This is an option where there might be no other viable options at the moment.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Roots fuck things up.

[–] geissi@feddit.de 8 points 11 months ago

Tbf, it was an art installation and the overreactions it generated are hilarious.

[–] Blademax@lemmy.one 8 points 11 months ago

It's coarse, and rough, and irritating, and it gets everywher...wait...that's sands... Nevermind...

[–] NabeGewell@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Imagine replacing trees with those, and some drunk breaking the glass like once a week lmao

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Heavybell@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I am under the impression that trees don't actually produce that much oxygen. That they're more like carbon banks, storing it as they grow and then releasing it again when they die, rot or burn down. Meanwhile most of the oxygen produced actually comes from algae and other sources.

Source: some old memory of something I heard, so take it with a grain of salt. It would explain these things tho, beyond the cases where growing a tree would be impractical.

[–] Pietson@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

Can't wait for some teenager to smash it as a dare.

[–] doctorn@r.nf 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It's been proven that humans didn't actually get most of their fresh air from the rainforest, but actually from millions of these algea in the sea... Which is actually more logical, since trees do the opposite at night, kinda undoing any advantage they made during the day... Hence why it's said you should never put a decorative small tree or even plants in the bedroom as they can take away oxygen levels in closed rooms at night. It's even said not to sleep under trees outside at night cause it can cause respiratory problems.

[–] Micromot@feddit.de 10 points 11 months ago (7 children)

They don't use enough oxygen over night to negate the effect as they use the carbon to grow. It's still bad to have a lot of plants in your bedroom, but it doesn't really matter as long as they are relatively small.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›