this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
1247 points (87.9% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9780 readers
69 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fal@yiffit.net 111 points 11 months ago (4 children)

You're not using your bed right now. Are you letting a homeless person sleep in it?

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago (32 children)

That's not a contradiction. Your, my, and everyone's bed is for sleeping in. The beds in that store are for accumulation of wealth. This displays the harsh efficiencies of capitalism, because the people in the most need for a bed cannot afford to have one.

[–] dwalin@lemmy.world 123 points 11 months ago (22 children)

I belive the beds in a store that sells beds are either to be sold or to help you choose a bed. They are not "fuck you, see how many beds i have" beds

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago (10 children)

It'll probably be sold at a discount too since it was for display

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

For probably still more money than street sleeping homeless guy can afford of we are being honest.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] bioemerl@kbin.social 19 points 11 months ago (20 children)

The beds in that store are for accumulation of wealth

...selling people beds so they have beds to sleep in. Beds that aren't riddled with bugs thanks to the store not being a homeless shelter.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

So beds in the store are for accumulation of wealth but then when someone buys them they're for sleeping in? Deep

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 17 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Is there like an Uber for this?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 80 points 11 months ago (33 children)

What the fuck is with this thread being overrun with dickheads? Is this the breaking point, has Lemmy reached critical mass?

The image represents how capitalism uses the myth of scarcity. There's a bed there, and there's a human being sleeping on the ground. The lie is that there isn’t enough to go around; that somebody has to go without.

That's bullshit. We have everything.

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 11 months ago (13 children)

The message is that you deserve nothing and must earn everything, not that there isn't enough to go around.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 20 points 11 months ago (5 children)

The annoying thing is that there will very likely be a homeless shelter in this city that he's not allowed to sleep in because they have a zero tolerance drug policy.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago

Lemmy recently had a swarm of conservative sign ups and/or bot accounts in the last few days.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 70 points 11 months ago (10 children)

I don’t get it… is that store supposed to let people in to sleep on their beds?

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago

Just a statement about how we have the resources readily available yet unobtainable to some.

[–] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lemmy. Huh. It gets tiring aftet a while.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's a critique on capitalism, where we have the technology and products to improve our quality of life but restrict access to them for a considerable percentage of humas. You're welcome.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 23 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Even in a utopian communist society there would be showrooms for products, to help people select what best meets their sleep/medical needs. Those beds would be unused too.

It is a separate issue, that the showroom is not responsible for, that resulted in a homeless person not having a bed.

Systemic issues have systemic solutions. If you try to apply a local solution to a systemic problem, you just kicked the can. (As in, letting homeless people use the showroom beds).

[–] anarchist@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago (3 children)

No. In utopian society there wouldn't be the person who doesn't have a bed.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Ok? That's not contested in my comment.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Guy can't even take a nap without being abused by propagandists.

[–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 47 points 11 months ago (96 children)

Yeah, we should own those dirty communist propagandists by housing every homeless person.

The commies will be sooo owned if we do that.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

yes please daddy antisocialist me harder

load more comments (95 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

I've always pointed to the fact that over half the food in the US is left to rot until it ends up in a landfill yet food insecurity is rampant in the richest country in the world.

When they send police to arrest people, including homeless people and parents trying to feed their kids, for dumpster diving behind grocery stores and some grocery stores now literally shred or pour bleach on the packages of still sealed food that they throw away, maybe it's a sign that society needs a pretty major paradigm change on how goods and services should be distributed.

When police arrest people for giving homeless people food, maybe we should question who they're really here to serve and protect.

[–] Lennnny@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is a chat between my husband and I the other day and I've just felt so sad about it since then. Horrific display of wastefulness to humans AND birds

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Sigh, remember when small restaurants and bistros literally used to let employees take unsold food at the end of the day, and if there were still food left after going through the employees it would be set out on the counter for anyone else to take? Remember when that used to be a massive perk of working in food service?

Apparently many large chain venues aren't even letting employees take unsold food anymore, using "safety" as an excuse even though the sellable and unsellable food are often literally minutes apart.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 42 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

Wasteful is the wrong word. Waste implies this is some kind of poor planning, inefficiency or oversight.

Capitalism truly is all about efficiency, literally at the expense of basic humanity.

This isn't unintentional waste, this is intentional separation of the poor from resources. This is intentional artificial scarcity. The fact that many are literally separated from and thus lack a bed (or a roof, or food, etc) is what makes a bed a more valuable commodity for those with enough capital to purchase one from the private owner class through vendors like this one. If basic twin beds were publically available or subsidized, it would lower the capital value and profit potential of the swankier beds. And that is something the owners won't tolerate.

Under unrestrained market capitalism, there need to be people dying in the streets, otherwise people won't appreciate the capital value of purchasing what they need to live.

We Americans cast our sub-optimal capital batteries out to die of exposure. This is by design. If, as an American not born into wealth, you refuse or are unable to generate value for the owners directly, you will still have an important economic function you will be forced to fulfill: a capitalism scarecrow, meant to scare the wage slaves back to work on Monday, making money for the owners in exchange for minimal subsistence.

We could house and shelter all our fellow Americans, it isn't a matter of resources or space. We choose not to, and we also antagonize our powerless homeless as the villains selfishly lowering our property values by continuing to exist while destitute. We don't, because market capitalism incentivises cruelty for profit, and we refuse to reign it in for fear of slowing its self serving growth/metastasis at the expense of the society it is supposed to serve.

This is an image of our economy's and society's ~~waste~~ intential, greed incentivised cruelty. We Americans are a cruel people far more interested in getting more than our neighbors than entertaining being part of a society.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (9 children)

Depends on your definition of waste. Capitalism produces a lot of waste, arguably part of what has gotten us into this pickle with climate change.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Capitalism itself doesn't define that as waste. It defines the damage it inflicts on the commons, the earth, and the poor in pursuit of profit as an externality.

Externalities of course being Orwellian double speak for "lol not my problem you fucking suckers 🤑."

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Fitik@fedia.io 31 points 11 months ago (9 children)

Lemmy try not to blame capitalism challenge/s

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago (9 children)

You know what's so sad about something like this?

The conservative seeing this will opt to blame the individual. This conservative will most frequently espouse themselves to be a Christian nonetheless. "Jesus-like" in aspirations and idolatry.

And yet, they'll have the knee-jerk reaction to this image that is saying, "Well they put themselves in that position."

"It wasn't the happenstance of birth locations,."

"It wasn't the culmination of external forces and externalities building to this moment."

"It wasn't the fact that their life was harder than my own."

"Or perhaps my life was hard and I'm using the survivor-bias fallacy to justify kicking the ladder out from under me."

The conservative believes there are lesser people who deserve what they get coming. It's seemingly incomprehensible to them that we humans are quite literally of the same species, and that you must come to the conclusion one of two possibilities: Either (1) We are all a blank slate from the start and thus products of our environment. Nurture comprising the vast majority of what influences us. Which means those left out on the streets; those who take drugs in an ideal state of mind don't want to be there, but are already too far broken from past experiences to reconcile their immediate choices (and need saved; protected; rehabilitated by the same outside forces that put them there in the fist place). Or (2) It is genetic, which means there is a predisposition incompatible with the inherently-flawed system we've built for ourselves. They're a circle in a square system, and it's thus just the same not their choice. And so again, the system should adapt and accommodate them just the same to promote a healthier society overall.

THAT would be more Jesus-like. Not the lazy cop-out that casts them off as degenerates. Such people lack empathy and cannot comprehend the bigger picture.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 19 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The real capitalist crime is that a mattress sells for such ridiculous prices that they charge thousands of dollars for a chunk of foam and some springs.

Most mattress stores print money, and only need to make 4 sales a month to stay in business.

They are insanely overpriced. Why doesn't everyone just buy cheap beds from Costco and IKEA?!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Sacrificing the needs of the many for the wants of the few.

[–] rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Grossly oversimplified. Dumb meme that adds nothing substantive

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

In a wasteful system there'd be some factory churning out obsolete mattresses to fill a warehouse that nobody needs because there's a quota to be met.

Meanwhile the workers can't eat enough because resources were allocated by a bureaucrat last year who's got no personal incentive to see either system work smoothly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 11 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Who tf need 8 pillows of various sizes on their bed?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›