this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
193 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2298 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 171 points 1 year ago (3 children)

TL:DR Republicans got subpoenaed as part of an investigation, to determine who is funding conservative SCOTUS members. The suspicion is that lawmakers have been lining SCOTUS members’ pockets to protect their bills. Republicans are screaming and crying, because they don’t want to be forced to actually give up that info.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why are they mad? I'm convinced Republicans could consume a child on national television and their constituents would find a way to blame it on the Democrats.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where is that from? The actor is very good. Thanks in advance

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Okay, so say they discover who’s giving who money.

Than what?

Is it illegal? Will these rich donors be arrested over it?

Will anything actually happen or is this just performative.

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago

It would be bribery, and yes, quite a few people could theoretically go to prison, including conservatives on the supreme court.

Also, senators and representatives as well.

If this is big enough, it could mean a massive blow to republicans, and the dismantling of their conservative movement funding.


Now, all of that happening is an almost impossible ask, so don't get your hopes up.

Still, just the possibility of it has the repubs scared shitless.

[–] ElleChaise@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

I get the feeling they're in two camps. Some rich and powerful people are true believers; others are performers. Why can't there ever be a person who actually wants to be "tough on crime" when it comes to white collar crimes and politics? It's almost as if the entire thing is designed to keep people where they are forever, rich and poor.

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

You can't take away our bribes! Our corpo owners won't pay our salary now.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Republicans are so angry because they expected Democrats to bind themselves to rules that Republicans get to ignore without consequence.

Since Democrats simply let Republican fuckery slide, it's nice that they're at least taking advantage of fuckery being acceptable instead of being straitjacketed by their own self-imposed devotion to decorum over progress.

For once.

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Perfect for thee, but not for me.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

One of the doucheknobs from Texas, Cornyn, whas whining yesterday about terrible it would be for Congress to subpoena "private individuals."

Like, yes, you performative asshat, everyone who doesn't work in government is, by definition, a private individual.

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't congress just subpoena Hunter Biden? He's a private individual.

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Yes but they don't like Hunter Biden so it's different. Come on!

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago

Congress literally already does that all the time.

[–] bquintb@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Republican tears are best tears

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Republican tears are best tears

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

They throw hissy fits every day. What’s new?