this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
27 points (80.0% liked)

Canada

7163 readers
245 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] God_Is_Love@reddthat.com 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This honestly seems low for the way things are, I suspect it will increase in the next couple years as real estate and rental prices catch up to people who have been less effected so far

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah this is so wrong. I read stats claiming only the top 30% make $70k annually or more. That’s basically $4k a month take home. Given rent and bills, that actually likely leaves people with like $1,500 for food and other. Given the cost of food, I can’t see anyone eating on a budget of $200 a month. Even eating moderately costs about $400-500 and you’re likely making most of your meals from scratch.

And that’s the top 30%. What are the other 70% living like? Because I buy a dozen eggs, some milk, a loaf of bread and I’m down like $20.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think you are looking at individual income where household is more appropriate. The median after tax household income is 68k. So that's still 50% doing worse, but it's a little better than you make out.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sorry how is 68k annually per household better than 70k per person? Your figures make the situations worse.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

70k per household is the top 50% of renters not the top 30 like you say.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 0 points 10 months ago

Yes but out of a household of 4, you’d theoretically have two people earning $70k annually if per person right? So your stats half the household incomes but only drop the population by 15% give or take. Thats far more bleak.

[–] tarsn@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Statistics are probably not up to date

[–] God_Is_Love@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The solution: Policies that increase incomes

Reducing food insecurity requires income solutions such as higher minimum wage, higher social assistance rates and lower income tax rates for the lowest income households.

While I do agree that these should be in place, the reality is that it's not only the lowest income households who are struggling with the cost of living.

Support should be given to all households who aren't outright wealthy or else you're ignoring the majority of Canadians.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

NDP want their policies to be universal

Liberals want it to only apply to the lowest class

Cons don’t want any

Based on popularity, most people seem to be between none and bare minimum

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

I want to stab you 20 times.

You don't want to be stabbed at all.

Let's compromise and stab you 10 times.

[–] asg101@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

The oligarchs are intent on starving us all to death.