this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
425 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3196 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 109 points 3 months ago

This seems to be typical for these weirdos.

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 79 points 3 months ago

So murderers can just admit to murder and face no consequences wtf

[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 75 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I knew it would link to The Only Moral Abortion is My Abortion, a classic.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Two and a half decades later and still just as relevant as ever.

It’ll never stop being relevant and true

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 43 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Graçias! Or rather, merci!

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

So turn yourself in already.

[–] Skoobie@sh.itjust.works 39 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Couldn't help but notice that at no point is he quoted as saying his abortion was the wrong decision and that he wouldn't do it again...

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 20 points 3 months ago

Or the reason. Surely a man who says abortions are because a woman can’t “keep her skirt down” only did it because his wife was in danger, was raped, or the fetus wasn’t viable and not out of convenience or family planning right?

[–] RangerJosie@sffa.community 5 points 3 months ago

Because they don't see it as right or wrong. Moral justifications are for the slaves, not the masters.

The population of serfs has to keep growing to keep the wealth extraction gravy train running on time.

For the wealthy, an abortion is the small expense of 1 chartered jet ride to Europe. Call it a weekend vacation.

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago

What a massive hypocrite.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 30 points 3 months ago

"It’s about killing a child because you weren’t responsible enough to keep your skirt down.”

He even managed to take the typical, puritanical "keep your pants on" or "keep it in your pants" and turn that around to specifically slut-shame women. Great guy.

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

“Let’s say I was the governor, I had a willing legislature, we could pass a bill saying you can’t have an abortion in North Carolina for any reason,” he says in one clip. In another, Robinson says, “For me there is no compromise on abortion, it makes no difference to me why or how that child ended up in that womb.” Elsewhere, he says: “Abortion in this country is not about protecting the lives of mothers. It’s about killing a child because you weren’t responsible enough to keep your skirt down.”

He said that “if I’m a person who is seen as an individual who’s standing on a stage pointing down at a young woman saying, ‘You can’t have an abortion,’ that is not the right approach.” Instead, he said, “The right approach is to come down off the stage, embrace that young woman, and tell them about the reasons why I believe she should choose life, and then ultimately leaving it up to her based on the laws that we have on the books. That’s the reason why we put that commercial out, and the reason why I was willing to do it. Because we feel like that this is an issue of the heart. And if we’re going to ‘win on this issue,’ we’re going to win people over on this issue, we’ve got to show people that we care. Because we’ve got to show them how deeply it affects people.”

How can I trust that you’ve changed your view and not just your campaign strategy? Because this dude has previously stated he wants no abortion for any reason. Watch out for the wolf in sheep’s clothing!

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

ultimately leaving it up to her based on the laws that we have on the books

That's not leaving it up to her you goddamn weasel! Leaving it up to her would mean not making fucking laws about it!

He's not a wolf in sheep's clothing, just a wolf who talks out of both sides of this mouth.

[–] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

See, I never just did things just to do them. Come on, what am I gonna do? Just all of a sudden jump up and grind my feet on somebody's couch like it's something to do? Come on. I got a little more sense than that.

Yeah, I remember grinding my feet on Eddie's couch.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

“Abortion in this country is not about protecting the lives of mothers. It’s about killing a child because you weren’t responsible enough to keep your skirt down.”

Wow! Leave it to North Carolina to make my red state's controlled Governor and legislature come out looking positively progressive when they are far from it.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 24 points 3 months ago

To be fair to these weirdos, it's not all that obvious that they're opposed to murder.

[–] pezhore@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago

“I can remember this as a young man, when we were arguing about whether or not we should be required to wear seat belts, or if we should wear seat belts,” Robinson continues. “And I can always remember there’d be one person to say, ‘Well, what if I get stuck on a railroad tracks and my seat belt won’t come off?’ Number one, if you are stuck on the train tracks, that is Darwin. That’s not any of my concern. That is Darwin. You saw those train tracks. If you couldn’t get past them, I cannot help you.”

He concludes: “That is not a good argument, see, because in this country, we’re not talking about a bunch of people who go down to the abortion place because they’ve been raped or because they’ve been a victim of incest. We’re talking about a culture that we have created in this society that tells you when you want to feel good, go in there and go lay down and do your thing. If you get in a little trouble, it’s alright to murder somebody to get out of it. It is not — it is not okay.”

First off, this is some sort of logical fallacy here - straw man maybe?

Secondly, isn't wearing a seatbelt now something that conservatives are railing against again?

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

There's a great ad against him about this with clips from his live stream when he said it. At the end of the ad, he says "your body is not yours!" if that tells you anything of what conservatives believe.